Cited by 47Online and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline Learning and Analytics

The influence of internationalised versus local content on online intercultural collaboration in groups: A randomised control trial study in a statistics course

Open access
Mittelmeier, Jenna, Rienties, Bart, Tempelaar, Dirk, Hillaire, Garron, Whitelock, Denise·2018·Computers & Education

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultural differences in thinking styles, use of technologies, and course content need to be considered when designing COL.

    “Studies have emphasized the need to consider cultural differences in such as thinking styles (Gu, 2017), use of technologies (Grothaus et al., 2021) as well as course content (Mittelmeier, 2018) when designing COL.”

    From Collaborative Online Learning across Cultures: the Role of Teaching and Social Presence (2022) · cites this paper as Mittelmeier, 2018

    The indexed title identifies a study of how internationalised versus local content influences online intercultural group collaboration, supporting the relevance of course content. The available passages do not state a recommendation to consider cultural differences in course content when designing collaborative online learning. The thinking-styles and technology portions are attributed to other sources. (LLM, conf=0.68)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Hillaire, G., & Whitelock, D.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Mittelmeier, Jenna
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
118
Pages
82-95
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769614187
Cited by
47
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
computer-supported collaborative learning, cross-cultural collaboration, online collaboration, student participation, group dynamics, cultural diversity, statistics education, blended learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review