The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure?: Further evidence and exploration from the UK
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to explore whether there is any relationship(s) between social and environmental disclosure and the financial market performance of the UK's largest companies. Design/methodology/approach: Two data sets were used in the study. The CSEAR database of UK companies provided the social and environmental disclosure component. The second data were the stock market returns earned by the largest UK companies as listed by The Times 1,000. A series of statistical tests was performed to examine whether any relationship could be detected in either the cross sectional or longitudinal data over a period of ten years. Findings: No direct relationship between share returns and disclosure was found. Neither had such a relationship been expected, in keeping with the prior literature. However, the longitudinal data revealed a convincing relationship between consistently high(low) returns and the predilection to high(low) disclosure. There is no single convincing theoretical explanation as to why this might be. Originality/value: This paper demonstrates the importance of examining a range of hypotheses on longitudinal data when other research suggests that any relationships are unlikely to be unstable year on year. More significantly, this paper is motivated not by a concern to understand better how investors' already‐high returns may be bettered, but rather to explore how the alleged potential of financial markets to contribute to social responsibility and sustainability might be engaged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529
Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers
Jackall, R. (1988) · International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/bf01390690 · Cited by 1,296
Cited by
Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report
Luo, L., Lan, Y., & Tang, Q. (2012) · Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting · doi:10.1111/j.1467-646x.2012.01055.x · Cited by 448
CSR disclosure: the more things change…?
Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1549 · Cited by 413
O'Sullivan, N., & O'Dwyer, B. (2009) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570910955443 · Cited by 154
Value Relevance of Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Firms
Uyar, A., & Kılıç, M. (2012) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691931211248918 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-255
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011188981
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure?: Further evidence and exploration from the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513570610656105
- The paper
- Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure?: Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610656105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.