The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of actor‐network theory in accounting research
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to discuss how Bruno Latour's version of actor‐network theory has influenced accounting research. It also seeks to show that Latour's writings contain unexplored potential that may inspire future accounting research. Design/methodology/approach: The paper takes the form of a critical literature review and discussion. Findings: Since the early 1990s, actor‐network theory, particularly the work of Bruno Latour, has inspired accounting researchers and led to a number of innovative studies of accounting phenomena. In particular, Latour's book,Science in Action, has been the primary source of inspiration for accounting research. This means that there is unexplored potential in Latour's more recent writings which may lead to further inspiration and research in the field of accounting. Research limitations/implications: The paper reviews only a few of the relatively large number of accounting papers that apply actor‐network theory. A different sample might have given a somewhat different picture. Furthermore, it focuses on the influence of Latour's work and refrains from discussing how the writings of Michel Callon, John Law or other thinkers within the actor‐network tradition are used in accounting research. Originality/value: This is the first extensive review discussing the influence of Latour on accounting research that engages in a critical discussion of under‐explored potential in Latour's recent work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · cited 1×
“The concept was coined by John Austin, the English language philosopher ( Austin, 1962”
BackgroundReassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4888 · Cited by 9,294
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,828
Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern
Latour, B. (2004) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/421123 · Cited by 5,595
Social Construction of Reality
(2020) · The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society · doi:10.4135/9781483375519.n617 · Cited by 4,707
Latour, B. (1987) · Cited by 4,106
Cited by
Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research
Lukka, K., & Vinnari, E. (2014) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-03-2013-1265 · Cited by 299
Qualitative Research in Auditing: A Methodological Roadmap
Power, M. K., & Gendron, Y. (2015) · AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-10423 · Cited by 294
Cuckston, T. (2018) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-10-2015-2264 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Justesen, L., & Mouritsen, J.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-02-15
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-193
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000990149
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 34.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of actor‐network theory in accounting research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513571111100672
- The paper
- Justesen, L., & Mouritsen, J. (2011). Effects of actor‐network theory in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111100672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.