Exploring green consumers' product demands and consumption processes: The case of Portuguese green consumers
Abstract
Purpose There is a research gap in terms of understanding how green consumers perceive green products in a marketplace context. The purpose of this paper is to respond to this omission by exploring the green consumers' product demands and consumption processes. Design/methodology/approach Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with Portuguese green consumers are used to discuss potential key factors (reasons to buy green products, defining green product characteristics, feelings about pricing, perceived product confidence, willingness to compromise, environmental knowledge, consideration of alternatives, product's point of purchase and use and disposal). Findings The analysis indicates that green consumers represent an artificial segment and provides further empirical support to the definition of sustainability as a market‐oriented concept. The paper's findings suggest that mainstreaming green products is a more positive alternative than green segmentation. Research limitations/implications This research is exploratory in nature and the authors followed established guidelines to ensure objectivity. However, the study's findings are restricted to Portuguese green consumers and a replication in other countries would help to remove any potential country bias. Practical implications Sustainable businesses are eager to learn who the green consumer is in order to define this market segment. This may not represent the best strategy, however. Targeting green products to a niche market b…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Customers express concerns for the environment, but their attitudes are not always reflected in the consumption or management of resources.
“Customers express concerns for the environment, but their attitudes are not always reflected in the consumption or management of resources (Luzio and Lemke 2013;Wever et al. 2008).”
From Servitization for a Circular Economy in Construction (2025) · cites this paper as Luzio and Lemke 2013
Cites
Review and Critical Assessment of Research on Marketing and the Environment
Kilbourne, W. E., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/026725798784867716 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servitization for a Circular Economy in Construction
Mark‐Herbert, C., Berg, E., Aldberg, J., & Roos, A. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4218 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pedro Pereira Luzio, J., & Lemke, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- ORCID
- Lemke, Fred
- Venue
- European Business Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-04-26
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-300
- ISSN
- 0955-534X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1493754875
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Business Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Keywords
- green consumers, green products, consumer behavior, product demand, consumption process, willingness to compromise, green pricing, environmental knowledge, point of purchase, product disposal, Portuguese consumers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review