The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this manuscript is to explore consumers’ perceptions of Internet retail service quality. This is accomplished via two studies. Study 1 utilizes qualitative depth interviews to identify five dimensions important to consumers in their assessment of the quality of Internet retailers. These are termed performance (how well an online retailer does in terms of meeting expectations regarding order fulfillment), access (Internet retailer’s ability to provide a variety of products from anywhere in the world), security (relating to perceptions of trust in the online retailer’s integrity regarding financial and privacy issues), sensation (interactive features of the e‐retailer’s Web site) and information (quantity and credibility of information provider by the online retailer). Study 2 quantifies the five dimensions using multi‐item scales, and conducts a survey to assess the reliability and validity (convergent, discriminant, and nomological) of these dimensions. Theoretical and managerial implications of the results are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252174 · Cited by 4,860
Cited by
The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty
Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002 · Cited by 1,684
The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics
Harris, L. C., & Goode, M. M. H. (2004) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002 · Cited by 1,425
Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model
Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.016 · Cited by 1,353
Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006 · Cited by 1,037
e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels
Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006 · Cited by 581
Metadata
- Authors
- Janda, S., Trocchia, P. J., & Gwinner, K. P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Service Industry Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 412-431
- ISSN
- 0956-4233 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050578586
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 21.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
