The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adoption of cloud computing technologies in supply chains: An organizational information processing theory approach
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to employ organizational information processing theory to assess how a firm's information processing requirements and capabilities combine to affect the intention to adopt cloud computing as an enabler of electronic supply chain management systems. Specifically, the paper examines the extent to which task uncertainty, environmental uncertainty, and inter‐organizational uncertainty affect intention to adopt cloud computing technology and how information processing capability may moderate these relationships. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses a multiple method approach, thus examining the hypothesized model with both quantitative and qualitative methods. To begin, the paper incorporates a Delphi study as a way in which to choose a practically relevant characterization of the moderating variable, information processing capability. The authors then use a survey method and hierarchical linear regression to quantitatively test their hypotheses. Finally, the authors employ interviews to gather additional qualitative data, which they examine via use of content analysis in order to provide additional insight into the tenability of the proposed model. Findings: The quantitative analysis suggests that significant two‐way interactions exist between each independent variable and the moderating variable; each of these interactions is significantly related to intention to adopt cloud computing. The qualitative results support the assertion that information processing requirements and information processing capability affect intention to adopt cloud computing. These findings support the relationships addressed in the hypothesized model and suggest that the decision to adopt cloud computing is based upon complex circumstances. Research limitations/implications: This research is limited by the use of single key informants for both the quantitative and qualitative portions of the study. Nonetheless, this study enhances understanding of electronic supply chain management systems, and specifically cloud computing, through the application of organizational information processing theory. The authors’ mixed‐methods approach allowed them to draw more substantive conclusions; the findings provide a theoretical and empirical foundation for future research in this area, and also suggest the use of additional theoretical perspectives. Practical implications: This study provides insight that can help supply chain managers to better understand how requirements, when coupled with capabilities, may influence the decision to adopt cloud computing as an enabler of supply chain management systems. Originality/value: As an emerging technology, cloud computing is changing the form and function of information technology infrastructures. This study enhances the understanding of how this technology may diffuse within the supply chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,654
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 · Cited by 20,808
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,161
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., et al. (2010) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1721654.1721672 · Cited by 9,464
(1988) · Cited by 6,825
Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., & Brandic, I. (2009) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2008.12.001 · Cited by 5,937
Cited by
Li, Y., Dai, J., & Cui, L. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777 · Cited by 922
El Baz, J., & Ruel, S. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107972 · Cited by 868
Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy
Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Mangla, S. K., & Luthra, S. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502 · Cited by 339
ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future
Harris, I., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.005 · Cited by 324
Senyo, P. K., Addae, E., & Boateng, R. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.007 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Cegielski, C. G., Allison Jones‐Farmer, L., Wu, Y., & Hazen, B. T.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-08-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-211
- ISSN
- 0957-4093 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1558467047
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 37.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adoption of cloud computing technologies in supply chains: An organizational information processing theory approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09574091211265350
- The paper
- Cegielski, C. G., Allison Jones‐Farmer, L., Wu, Y., & Hazen, B. T. (2012). Adoption of cloud computing technologies in supply chains: An organizational information processing theory approach. The International Journal of Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574091211265350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.