The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future
Open accessAbstract
The role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in freight transport as key enabler is well recognised. However the uptake of recent ICT advances for multimodal freight transport provisions in the UK and Europe has been slow. The aim of our paper is to explore the potential reasons for such a slow adoption and assess how recent technological advances such as cloud computing and Internet of Things might have changed the landscape and thus help to overcome these barriers. Via an extensive review of 33 EU framework programme projects, we are able to consolidate and present current major efforts in ICT developments in the freight multimodal transport setting at European level. We further discuss barriers inhibiting quick take-up of ICT applications in multimodal transport. Resolutions were then explored by reviewing four key ICT development trends recently emerging and evaluating their potential impact in reducing such barriers for deployment. Our contribution is two-fold: it advances current knowledge by presenting an up-to-date overview of existing and emerging ICT applications in the field of multimodal transport and barriers to e-enabled multimodal transport. It also captures some of the best practices in industry and aims to provoke a debate among practitioners and academics via the analysis of how innovative use of recent technological developments could potentially lower the barriers to multimodal ICT adoption and lead to a more integrated freight transport network. Therefore it lays the foundation for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., et al. (2010) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1721654.1721672 · Cited by 9,464
Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., & Brandic, I. (2009) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2008.12.001 · Cited by 5,937
Gluesing, J. C. (2012) · Leadership in Science and Technology: A Reference Handbook · doi:10.4135/9781412994231.n14 · Cited by 3,210
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451
Drazin, R. (1991) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/bf02371446 · Cited by 2,122
processes of technological innovation
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (1990) · Cited by 1,834
Management information systems: managing the digital firm
Caldas, M. P. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100014 · Cited by 1,424
Management Information Systems, Managing Digital Firm,
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (1988) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 1,416
Cited by
Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140 · Cited by 1,501
Kache, F., & Seuring, S. (2017) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2015-0078 · Cited by 938
Fosso Wamba, S., Queiroz, M. M., & Trinchera, L. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107791 · Cited by 473
Smart logistics based on the internet of things technology: an overview
Ding, Y., Jin, M., Li, S., & Feng, D. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1757053 · Cited by 398
Brous, P., Janssen, M., & Herder, P. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.008 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, I., Wang, Y., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 159
- Pages
- 88-103
- ISSN
- 0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064094125
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 31.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.005
- The paper
- Harris, I., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2015). ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.