Cited by 160Technology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Mobile shopping motivation: an application of multiple discriminant analysis

Yang, Kiseol, Kim, Hye‐Young·2012·International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine mobile shoppers' shopping motivations compared with those of non‐mobile shoppers (i.e. potential adopters) and to identify driving motivations for consumers to use the mobile shopping channel. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 400 mobile service users was drawn from a purchased consumer panel who completed a web‐based survey. Multiple discriminant analysis was used to analyze the data. Findings The results indicate that idea, efficiency, adventure, and gratification shopping motivations are significant determinants of mobile shoppers, implying that those shopping motivations are push factors of mobile shopping. Research limitations/implications The sample of this study consists primarily of US consumers with the largest group of respondents aged 19 to 30 years old; thus, the result may have a limited application to other countries and other age groups. Future research is encouraged to categorize mobile shopping service characteristics into shopping motivations and value. Practical implications The results suggest that idea, efficiency, adventure, and gratification shopping motivations need to be incorporated into the development of mobile shopping service functions and features to satisfy consumer needs and wants for the mobile shopping channel. Originality/value Due to the infancy stage of mobile shopping, there is minimal research comparing the two shopper segments' (mobile shoppers versus non‐mobile shoppers) motivations. This study…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09590551211263182

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., & Kim, H.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2012-08-31
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
778-789
ISSN
0959-0552 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975053178
Cited by
160
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
mobile shopping, shopping motivation, push factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review