Mobile shopping motivation: an application of multiple discriminant analysis
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to examine mobile shoppers' shopping motivations compared with those of non‐mobile shoppers (i.e. potential adopters) and to identify driving motivations for consumers to use the mobile shopping channel. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 400 mobile service users was drawn from a purchased consumer panel who completed a web‐based survey. Multiple discriminant analysis was used to analyze the data. Findings The results indicate that idea, efficiency, adventure, and gratification shopping motivations are significant determinants of mobile shoppers, implying that those shopping motivations are push factors of mobile shopping. Research limitations/implications The sample of this study consists primarily of US consumers with the largest group of respondents aged 19 to 30 years old; thus, the result may have a limited application to other countries and other age groups. Future research is encouraged to categorize mobile shopping service characteristics into shopping motivations and value. Practical implications The results suggest that idea, efficiency, adventure, and gratification shopping motivations need to be incorporated into the development of mobile shopping service functions and features to satisfy consumer needs and wants for the mobile shopping channel. Originality/value Due to the infancy stage of mobile shopping, there is minimal research comparing the two shopper segments' (mobile shoppers versus non‐mobile shoppers) motivations. This study…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
m-shoppers usually get stimulated by hedonic rather than utilitarian shopping values.
“Yang and Kim (2012) suggest that mshoppers usually get stimulated by hedonic rather than utilitarian shopping values.”
From Mobile shopping apps adoption and perceived risks: A cross-country perspective utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (2018) · cites this paper as Yang and Kim, 2012
Cites
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Go: how mobile shopping affects customer purchase behavior.
Wang, R. J.-H., Malthouse, E. C., & Krishnamurthi, L. (2015) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.01.002 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Chopdar, P. K., Korfiatis, N., Sivakumar, V. J., & Lytras, M. D. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.017 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
The influence of perceived risk on mobile shopping cart abandonment
Rodrigues, M. A., Proença, J., & Soares, I. (2024) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2022.2160480 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, K., & Kim, H.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-08-31
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 778-789
- ISSN
- 0959-0552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975053178
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 15.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- mobile shopping, shopping motivation, push factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review