Cited by 61Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignDisability Rights and Representation

Web site accessibility: an online sector analysis

Loiacono, Eleanor, McCoy, Scott·2004·Information Technology & People

Abstract

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), companies must provide customers with disabilities access to their “physical” stores. With the advent of the pure Web store, some wonder if the ADA will extend into “cyberspace”. So, are companies ready? This study assesses Web sites to determine their readiness. Results reveal that only 9 percent of the sites have accessible home pages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09593840410522198

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eighty percent of Web sites fail to satisfy basic accessibility requirements.

    “Research shows that 80% of Web sites do not meet basic accessibility requirements (Loiacono and McCoy, 2004;Sullivan and Matson, 2000;Klein et al., 2003).”

    From Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems (2010) · cites this paper as Loiacono and McCoy, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loiacono, E., & McCoy, S.
Affiliations
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • William & Mary (US)
Venue
Information Technology & People
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
87-101
ISSN
0959-3845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133317211
Cited by
61
References
20
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Technology and People (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
web accessibility, Americans with Disabilities Act, online store, people with disabilities, website evaluation, e-commerce, disability rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review