The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques
Abstract
Purchasing organizations are exposed to risk in their interactions with suppliers, whether it is recognized and managed, addressed in a cursory manner, or altogether ignored. In order to understand the supply risk that exists, purchasing organizations can proactively assess the probability and impact of supply risk in advance, or reactively discover risk after a detrimental event occurs. The purpose of this study is to explore, analyze, and derive common themes on supply risk assessment techniques. Findings from this research indicate that purchasing organizations can assess supply risk with techniques that focus on addressing supplier quality issues, improving supplier processes, and reducing the likelihood of supply disruptions. From an agency theory perspective, these risk assessment techniques facilitate the obtaining of information by purchasing organizations to verify supplier behaviors, promoting goal congruence between buying and selling firms, and reducing outcome uncertainty associated with inbound supply.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Cited by
Perspectives in supply chain risk management
Tang, C. S. (2006) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006 · Cited by 2,577
Supply chain risk management: a literature review
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467 · Cited by 1,363
Global supply chain risk management strategies
Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030810866986 · Cited by 1,252
El Baz, J., & Ruel, S. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107972 · Cited by 868
An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability
Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2006) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2007.01.004 · Cited by 787
Metadata
- Authors
- Zsidisin, G. A., Ellram, L. M., Carter, J. R., & Cavinato, J. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 397-413
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169600057
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09600030410545445
- The paper
- Zsidisin, G. A., Ellram, L. M., Carter, J. R., & Cavinato, J. L. (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410545445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.