The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global supply chain risk management strategies
Abstract
Purpose: Global supply chains are more risky than domestic supply chains due to numerous links interconnecting a wide network of firms. These links are prone to disruptions, bankruptcies, breakdowns, macroeconomic and political changes, and disasters leading to higher risks and making risk management difficult. The purpose of this paper is to explore the phenomenon of risk management and risk management strategies in global supply chains. Design/methodology/approach: This paper is based on an extensive literature review and a qualitative study comprising 14 in‐depth interviews and a focus group meeting with senior supply chain executives. Findings: The study provides insights into the applicability of six risk management strategies with respect to environmental conditions and the role of three moderators. Research limitations/implications: The model is developed in a global manufacturing supply chain context. It should be tested in other contexts and with other methods to provide generalizability. The study takes a much needed step toward building a theory of risk management in global supply chains, which opens important future research directions. Practical implications: This research provides direction to managers for choosing risk management strategies based on the global supply chain environment. Moderators have practical implications for global supply chain managers. Originality/value: The paper addresses an identified gap in the literature for selecting risk management strategies in global supply chains. It employs grounded theory, a methodology appropriate for theory‐building, to explore a phenomenon with an inadequate theoretical base.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
(1998) · Cited by 18,576
Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations
Williamson, O. E. (1979) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466942 · Cited by 10,190
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425 · cited 2×
“…to the concept of fit in the strategy literature, which suggests that a resource’s capacity to generate profits or to prevent losses depends, to a large extent, on the fit of a given strategy to the external environment (Amit and Schoemaker, 1993; Porter, 1991; Wernerfelt and Karnani, 1987).”
BackgroundMethodOrganizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
McCracken, G. (1988) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412986229 · Cited by 5,051
Towards a dynamic theory of strategy
Porter, M. E. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250121008 · Cited by 3,950
Building the Resilient Supply Chain
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090410700275 · Cited by 3,664
What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product
Fisher, M. L. (1997) · Harvard business review · Cited by 3,069
Cited by
Chowdhury, M. T., Sarkar, A., Paul, S. K., & Moktadir, M. A. (2022) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-020-00166-9 · Cited by 266
Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review
Gurtu, A., & Johny, J. (2021) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks9010016 · Cited by 259
Fisher Ke, J.-Y., Otto, J., & Han, C. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.066 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-04-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 192-223
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111402627
- Cited by
- 1,252
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 102.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global supply chain risk management strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09600030810866986
- The paper
- Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810866986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.