The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of supply chain management and logistics research
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the state of logistics and supply chain management (SCM) research in the last five years from the standpoint of existing methodologies. The state of research is assessed by examining the research design, number of hypothesis testing, research methods, data analysis techniques, data sources, level of analysis and country of authors. Design/methodology/approach: The review of SCM and logistics research is based on 442 papers published from 1999 to 2003 in the following three academic journals Journal of Business Logistics, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. Findings: Major findings show that there is an increase in the direct observation methods like case studies. In general, the research is more interpretive in nature. Survey method is still holding the highest position. More advanced techniques are being used for data analysis in empirical studies and there has been an increase in hypothesis testing. The trend in survey research is moving from exploratory to model building and testing. Research limitations/implications: The gaps identified in the review were: there are very few inter disciplinary studies; innovative application of secondary data is lacking, (c) research at inter organisation level is scanty; and the current state of research has failed to integrate all the firms in the value chain and treat them as a single entity. Originality/value: The methodological review will provide increased understanding of the current state of research in the discipline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mahroof, K. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.008 · Cited by 223
A literature review of empirical research methodology in lean manufacturing
Vamsi Krishna Jasti, N., & Kodali, R. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2012-0169 · Cited by 178
Barriers to implementing reverse logistics in South Australian construction organisations
Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., & Lehmann, S. (2015) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-10-2014-0325 · Cited by 121
Ensuring corporate travel compliance – Control vs. commitment strategies
Holma, A.-M., Bask, A., & Kauppi, K. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.04.008 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Sachan, A., & Datta, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 664-705
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024759384
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of supply chain management and logistics research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09600030510632032
- The paper
- Sachan, A., & Datta, S. (2005). Review of supply chain management and logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510632032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.