Cited by 263Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceService and Product Innovation

Path analysis of perceived service quality, satisfaction and loyalty in Greek insurance

Open access
Tsoukatos, Evangelos, Rand, Graham K.·2006·Managing Service Quality: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this article is to investigate the path service quality → customer satisfaction → loyalty, at the level of constructs, drawing from the Greek insurance industry. Design/methodology/approach A SERVQUAL type service‐quality instrument is developed for Greek insurance. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses are used to determine the scale's dimensionality. Path analysis is utilized to examine a model linking service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty at the level of constructs' individual determinants. Findings SERVQUAL's dimensionality is not confirmed. A non‐tangibles, tangibles structure exists in Greek insurance. “Tangibles” does not affect customer satisfaction while WOM is an antecedent of repurchasing intentions. Satisfaction does not directly influence the latter. Research limitations/implications This study suffers the limitation that it tests the fit of the model within the limits of a single service industry. Another limitation is availability sampling. However, the satisfactory fit of the estimated model allows for the study to be a reliable comparison basis for future research. Practical implications Insurance managers may use GIQUAL for measuring the quality of insurance services offered. They must improve the intangible rather than the tangible elements of service and direct their support mechanisms towards developing customers willing to engage in positive WOM. The proposed model can be used to provide comparable findings acro…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09604520610686746

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 81 · Cited by 263

Authors
Tsoukatos, E., & Rand, G. K.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Managing Service Quality: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
501-519
ISSN
0960-4529 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084695140
Cited by
263
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Managing Service Quality (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
perceived service quality, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, insurance industry, SERVQUAL, word of mouth, repurchase intention, tangibles, intangibles, service quality measurement scale, path analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review