Drivers of customers' service experiences: a study in the restaurant industry
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify, portray and analyse the frequent drivers of customer service experiences as described by customers in their own words – the voice of the customer. Design/methodology/approach: A critical incident technique study was conducted, based on 122 interviews, including 195 favourable and unfavourable narratives, about customer experiences. The data were analysed in an inductive manner and the results are presented by means of extracts from the narratives. Findings: The findings describe the dimensions of drivers of customers' favourable and unfavourable experiences and the frequent drivers, the social interaction, the core service and the physical context. Research limitations/implications: Customer experiences are processes and include dynamic interactions and the customer as a co‐producer. The study context is limited to the restaurant setting and Swedish customers. Practical implications: For managers the results suggest that great effort needs to be put into understanding the process of customer experiences and the various interactions involved, especially social interactions and the crucial roles of contact employees and customers involved in these interactions. Originality/value: The paper provides a detailed description and analysis of the frequent and less frequent drivers of favourable, and unfavourable customer experiences – the constellation of drivers. The findings are illustrated by extracts from customer narratives and show how experiences occur and that experiences are processes occurring in a social and physical environment when people do things together. Furthermore, the paper introduces customer experience to service dominant logic by describing the dynamics of resource interactions in customer experience formation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The consumer's relatively positive perception of the additional value of a product or service fosters more positive interactions with the brand, creating a stronger relationship between the customer and the brand.
“The consumer's relatively positive perception of the additional value of a product or service fosters more positive interactions with the brand, creating a stronger relationship between the customer and the brand (Garg et al., 2014;Walter et al., 2010).”
From Exploring the influence of flagship store experience and consumer interactions on purchase behaviour (2025) · cites this paper as Walter et al., 2010
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring the influence of flagship store experience and consumer interactions on purchase behaviour
Lourenco, C. E., Madeira, J. C., & Santos, V. M. (2025) · ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing · doi:10.5585/2025.27409 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Walter, U., Edvardsson, B., & Öström, Å.
- Venue
- Managing Service Quality: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-05-18
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-258
- ISSN
- 0960-4529
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review