The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to identify the quality determinants for education services provided by higher education institutions (HEIs) in Greece and to measure their relative importance from the students' points of view. Design/mthodology/approach: A multi‐criteria decision‐making methodology was used for assessing the relative importance of quality determinants that affect student satisfaction. More specifically, the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) was used in order to measure the relative weight of each quality factor. Findings: The relative weights of the factors that contribute to the quality of educational services as it is perceived by students was measured. Research limitations/implications: The research is based on the questionnaire of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. This implies that the measured weights are related mainly to questions posed in this questionnaire. However, the applied method (AHP) can be used to assess different quality determinants. Practical implications: The outcome of this study can be used in order to quantify internal quality assessment of HEIs. More specifically, the outcome can be directly used by HEIs for assessing quality as perceived by students. Originality/value: The paper attempts to develop insights into comparative evaluations of quality determinants as they are perceived by students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension
Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299205600304 · Cited by 10,628
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys
Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/b100605 · Cited by 4,491
(1991) · Journal of Retailing · Cited by 3,949
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293930180102 · Cited by 1,278
Application of the AHP in project management
Al-Harbi, K. M. A.-S. (2001) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00038-1 · Cited by 1,125
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.52.11.1187 · Cited by 882
Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions
Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1995) · Cited by 824
DeShields, O. W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (2005) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/09513540510582426 · Cited by 696
Abdullah, F. (2006) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x · Cited by 605
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P.
- Venue
- Quality Assurance in Education
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-07-13
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-244
- ISSN
- 0968-4883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031550033
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 92.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09684881011058669
- The paper
- Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011058669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.