The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: applying Herzberg's two‐factor theory
Abstract
Purpose: This paper focuses on the determinants of student satisfaction and retention in a college or university that are assumed to impact students' college experience. Design/methodology/approach: Using empirical data and Herzberg's two‐factor theory, a modified version of the questionnaire developed by Keaveney and Young was administered to approximately 160 undergraduate business students at a state university in South Central Pennsylvania. Using path analysis, the hypothesized effects were tested empirically by incorporating a comprehensive set of independent variables and self‐reported experiential assessments to predict experience, which in turn related to student satisfaction. Findings: The results indicate that the path coefficients from faculty and classes to students' partial college experience are consistent with the assumption that these are key factors that influence student partial college experience. Also, the path coefficient from student partial college experience to satisfaction was consistent with Herzberg's two‐factor theory. In addition, students who have a positive college experience are more likely to be satisfied with the college or university than students who do not have a positive college experience. Research limitations/implications: By focusing on antecedents of student satisfaction, colleges and universities can align their organizational structure, processes and procedures to become more customer‐oriented. Small sample size and self‐explicated retention data are the limitations of this study. Practical implications: It is recommended in this study that the changing nature of the higher education marketplace encourages college administrators to apply the customer‐oriented principles that are used in profit‐making institutions. Originality/value: Using a satisfaction model and a comprehensive set of independent variables and self‐reported experiential assessments to predict experience, this paper provides empirical findings to understand student satisfaction in higher education institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research
Tinto, V. (1975) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170024 · Cited by 7,888
Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition
Bean, J. P. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1988.11780239 · Cited by 7,369
Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6963 · Cited by 6,042
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315124827 · Cited by 5,559
The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms
Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.2.125 · Cited by 4,610
(1993) · Cited by 2,050
Bolton, R. N. (1998) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.45 · Cited by 1,948
Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition
Tinto, V. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001 · Cited by 1,507
Haughey, J. C. (2001) · Cited by 1,403
Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis
Spady, W. G. (1970) · Interchange · doi:10.1007/bf02214313 · Cited by 1,374
Cited by
Marketing-to-Millennials: Marketing 4.0, customer satisfaction and purchase intention
Dash, G., Kiefer, K., & Paul, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.016 · Cited by 451
Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: Using a new measurement tool
Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R., & Gläser‐Zikuda, M. (2010) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/09513551011022474 · Cited by 428
Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study
Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/09684881011058669 · Cited by 408
Helgesen, Ø., & Nesset, E. (2007) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550037 · Cited by 344
Student retention and engagement in higher education
Tight, M. (2020) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2019.1576860 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- DeShields, O. W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 128-139
- ISSN
- 0951-354X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026809193
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 31.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: applying Herzberg's two‐factor theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513540510582426
- The paper
- DeShields, O. W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (2005). Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: applying Herzberg's two‐factor theory. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510582426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.