The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Family as a source of consumer‐based brand equity
Abstract
Purpose: The main purpose of the current work is to analyse the role played by the family on consumer‐based brand equity. In the proposed model, information of a brand provided by both the family and the firm (via price, promotion and advertising spending) is analysed as a source of consumer‐based brand equity and its dimensions. Design/methodology/approach: An empirical study was conducted in young adults (18‐35) via structural equations model. Brand equity is analysed in six different brands of milk, toothpaste and olive oil. Findings: Results prove that positive brand information provided by the family has effects on the formation of brand awareness‐associations and perceived quality, and this may lead in turn, to brand loyalty and overall brand equity. The effects of the information provided by the family are higher than those of the marketing variables studied. Results also show that brand loyalty is much closer to the concept of overall brand equity than brand awareness‐associations and perceived quality. Research limitations/implications: The sample size does not allow to analyse differences in the effects between types of products and consumers. Practical implications: Due to the importance of the family on the formation of the consumer‐based brand equity, firms should analyse how to take advantage of this factor to approach new generations of consumers. Actions to foster family associations and brand recall may ease the transfer of brand equity from one generation to another. Originality/value: Family has been usually considered as an external influence factor of consumer behaviour, however, its importance as information provider had not been analysed in the process of brand equity formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices
Peter, J. P. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150948 · Cited by 1,189
Cited by
The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands
Schivinski, B., & Dabrowski, D. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2013.871323 · Cited by 940
Metadata
- Authors
- Bravo Gil, R., Fraj Andrés, E., & Martínez Salinas, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Product & Brand Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-06-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 188-199
- ISSN
- 1061-0421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093478522
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Family as a source of consumer‐based brand equity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/10610420710751564
- The paper
- Bravo Gil, R., Fraj Andrés, E., & Martínez Salinas, E. (2007). Family as a source of consumer‐based brand equity. Journal of Product & Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420710751564
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.