Learning styles and online education
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to recognize that individual learning styles must be taken into account in the instructional design template used in online education. The paper argues that when students' learning styles are identified, it is possible to define an appropriate context of learning. Design/methodology/approach: The paper identifies a set of instructional principles for online learning environments that are derived from multiple theories of learning with a consideration of different learning styles. The VARK questionnaire was used to determine learning styles of students who participated in two online courses. The VARK instrument identifies four distinct learning styles: visual (V); aural (A); reading/writing (R) and kinesthetic (K). These four dimensions are used to analyze the appropriateness of online learning structures. Findings: The paper identifies teaching strategies in online courses while recognizing the four learning styles. The paper concludes that the achievement of online learning can be improved by providing instruction in a manner consistent with each student's learning style. However, it is important to keep in mind that, even if a specific student learns best in a certain way, he or she should be exposed to a variety of learning experiences to become a more versatile online learner. Originality/value: The new result indicates that students with the auditory learning preference do not select online education as their first choice for learning. The combination of different techniques can make it possible for students with all types of learning styles to be successful in an online course.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students' online learning improved when the instructions provided are suitable for their learning preferences (Jones & Blankenship 2017; Zapalska & Brozik 2006).
“They concluded that students' online learning improved when the instructions provided are suitable for their learning preferences.”
From Towards a motivational design? Connecting gamification user types and online learning activities (2020) · cites this paper as Zapalska and Brozik (2006)
Integrating students' preferred motivational learning method and strategy in the design of online learning environments is consistent with the previous results of Jones and Blankenship (2017) or Zapalska and Brozik (2006).
“Integrating students' preferred motivational learning method and strategy in the design of online learning environments is consistent with the previous results of Jones and Blankenship (2017) or Zapalska and Brozik (2006).”
From Towards a motivational design? Connecting gamification user types and online learning activities (2020) · cites this paper as Zapalska and Brozik (2006)
Cites
Survey of research on learning styles
Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (1989) · Educational leadership · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Teaching and Learning Through Multiple Intelligences
Campbell, L. M., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Kozma, R. (1978) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1978.11776619 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Sims, R. R., & Sims, S. J. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Learning Style Researchers Define Differences Differently.
Dunn, R. (1981) · Educational leadership · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Learning Style and Study Skills Differences across Business and Other Academic Majors
Biberman, G., & Buchanan, J. (1986) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.1986.10772733 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Six Steps to Teacher Professionalism.
Wise, A. E. (1990) · Educational leadership · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a motivational design? Connecting gamification user types and online learning activities
Bovermann, K., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2020) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1186/s41039-019-0121-4 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments
Altınay, Z. (2017) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1232752 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zapalska, A., & Brozik, D.
- Affiliations
- United States Coast Guard Academy (US)
- Marshall University (US)
- ORCID
- Zapalska, Alina
- Venue
- Campus-Wide Information Systems
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 325-335
- ISSN
- 1065-0741 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964638086
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Campus-Wide Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- learning styles, online learning, instructional design, VARK questionnaire, visual learning, auditory learning, reading/writing learning, kinesthetic learning, teaching methods, virtual learning environments, student preferences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review