The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities: an empirical study
Abstract
Purpose: By expanding the technology acceptance model, the purpose of this paper is to provide a research model to examine the impact of online (information quality, system quality and service quality) and offline (offline activities) features on the sustainability of virtual communities.Design/methodology/approach– Based on a survey of 165 community members, the paper uses structural equation modeling approach to investigate the research model. Findings: The findings indicate that perceived of usefulness, perceived ease of use and offline activities are determinants of sustainability of virtual communities. In addition, information quality affects perceived usefulness, while system‐quality and service quality influence both perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of virtual communities. Research limitations/implications: Since this study only considered non‐profit virtual communities, it is unclear whether these analytical results can be generalized to other virtual communities. Further research can apply this research model to examine profit‐oriented virtual communities, such as eBay.com.tw or brand communities. Practical implications: To sustain a successful virtual community, attention must be paid to enhance both online and offline interactions, including content management, specific sets of web site functions and offline communication. Virtual community providers can apply the findings of this study to focus on the determinants of success for their virtual communities. Originality/value: Theoretically, while drawing upon the extended TAM, this paper provides a model that is capable of understanding the determinants of sustainability of virtual communities. From a managerial perspective, the findings should provide further insight into member behaviors, leading to more effective strategies for expanding the virtual community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty
Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002 · Cited by 1,684
Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities
Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00021-5 · Cited by 1,423 · cited 1×
“Virtual communities can be defined as groups of people with common interests and practices, who communicate for some duration in an organized way over the Internet through a common location or mechanism (Ridings et al., 2002).”
BackgroundVijayasarathy, L. R. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011 · Cited by 1,218
NELSON, R. R., TODD, P. A., & WIXOM, B. H. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823 · Cited by 998
Defining the virtual tourist community: Implications for tourism marketing
Wang, Y., Yu, Q., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2002) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/s0261-5177(01)00093-0 · Cited by 525
The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities
Bergquist, M., & Ljungberg, J. (2001) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00111.x · Cited by 480 · cited 2×
“Developments in virtual communities have already had a significant effect on the digital environment (Bergquist and Liungberg, 2001; de Souza and Preece, 2004; Hall and Graham, 2004).”
Background
Cited by
Examination of cognitive absorption influencing the intention to use a virtual community
Lin, H.-F. (2009) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290701662169 · Cited by 102
Self-citationMotivational Drivers of Content Contribution to Company‐ Versus Consumer‐Hosted Online Communities
Teichmann, K., Stokburger‐Sauer, N. E., Plank, A., & Strobl, A. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20783 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, H.
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-04-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-138
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985779860
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 27.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.