Cited by 60Technology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Market Behavior and PricingDigital Marketing and Social Media

Modeling e‐coupon proneness as a mediator in the extended TPB model to predict consumers' usage intentions

Chen, Mei‐Fang, Lu, Ting‐Yi·2011·Internet Research

Abstract

Purpose: Given the growing importance of e‐coupons as promotional devices, predicting consumers' e‐coupons redemption intention is essential to the evaluation of this promotion strategy. This paper aims to address this issue. An extended theory of planned behavior (TPB) research model which further includes consumers' e‐coupon proneness as a mediator is built in this study to predict consumers' usage intentions of e‐coupons. Design/methodology/approach: This research collected research data on a questionnaire collection web site, because most e‐coupon users are also internet surfers. There were 626 valid surveys returned as the data input for structural equation model (SEM) analysis. Findings: The results from this empirical study reveal that failure to include e‐coupon proneness as a mediator in the extended TPB model can lead to an inability to explain consumers' usage intentions of e‐coupons well. Moreover, given such a totally new environment, the direct influences of consumers' perceived behavioral control of using e‐coupons and consumers' past behavior of using e‐coupons are strong predictors and cannot be ignored. Research limitations/implications: The main limitation of this study is that the measures of the independent and dependent variables in the present study are based on self‐reported methods. It is likely that the relationships among some of the variables may be somewhat inflated, and a common method variance must be considered. Practical implications: The empirical results and findings from this study are helpful to online marketers if they can identify those consumers who have e‐coupon proneness and tailor the promotion campaigns to these consumers, raising the e‐coupon redemption intentions. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is among the first to provide analytical insight into e‐coupon usage intention with e‐coupon proneness as a mediator by building an extended TPB model in computer‐mediated environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/10662241111176344

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M., & Lu, T.
Affiliations
Tatung University (TW)
Venue
Internet Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-08-12
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
508-526
ISSN
1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084177320
Cited by
60
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Internet Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
e-coupons, theory of planned behavior, intention to use, perceived behavioral control, past behavior, digital marketing, consumer behavior, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review