Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy?
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To review the history of “green marketing” since the early 1990s and to provide a critique of both theory and practice in order to understand how the marketing discipline may yet contribute to progress towards greater sustainability. Design/methodology/approach: The paper examines elements of green marketing theory and practice over the past 15 years by employing the logic of the classic paper from 1985 “Has marketing failed, or was it never really tried” of seeking to identify “false marketings” that have hampered progress. Findings: That much of what has been commonly referred to as “green marketing” has been underpinned by neither a marketing, nor an environmental, philosophy. Five types of misconceived green marketing are identified and analysed: green spinning, green selling, green harvesting, enviropreneur marketing and compliance marketing. Practical implications: Provides an alternative viewpoint on a much researched, but still poorly understood area of marketing, and explains why the anticipated “green revolution” in marketing prefaced by market research findings, has not more radically changed products and markets in practice. Originality/value: Helps readers to understand why progress towards a more sustainable economy has proved so difficult, and outlines some of the more radical changes in thought and practice that marketing will need to adopt before it can make a substantive contribution towards greater sustainability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of clear regulation leaves room for a high number of greenwashing cases.
“Therefore, this leaves room for a high number of greenwashing cases (Peattie & Crane, 2005).”
From Internal factors influencing customer attitude, purchase intention and purchase behaviour with regard to green personal care products. A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Peattie & Crane, 2005
Cites
Environmental Advertising Claims: A Preliminary Investigation
Kangun, N., Carlson, L., & Grove, S. J. (1991) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/074391569101000203 · Cited by 255 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Perhaps the most damning market research evidence in the case for the decline of green marketing is the alarming cynicism being displayed by consumers about green products, green claims, and the companies behind them (Kangun et al., 1991; National Consumer Council, 1996).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Going green: how different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior
Yang, D., Lu, Y., Zhu, W., & Su, C. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.004 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
The Impact of Green Marketing Strategy on the Firm's Performance in Malaysia
Hasan, Z., & Ali, N. A. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.382 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Chamberlin, L., & Boks, C. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10062070 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Kardos, M., Gabor, M. R., & Cristache, N. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030873 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Fu, H.-P., Chang, T.-S., Yeh, H.-P., & Chen, Y.-X. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16245137 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Determinants of the Consumers Green Purchase Intention in Developing Countries
Butt, A. (2017) · Journal of Management Sciences · doi:10.20547/jms.2014.1704205 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Szaban, M. (2023) · Argumenta Oeconomica · doi:10.15611/aoe.2023.2.12 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peattie, K., & Crane, A.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Venue
- Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-370
- ISSN
- 1352-2752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963591044
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 28.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- autopapers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Qualitative Market Research An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- green marketing, sustainability, greenwashing, sustainable economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review