Cited by 944Environmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Supply Chain ManagementCorporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability

Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy?

Open access
Peattie, Ken, Crane, Andrew·2005·Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: To review the history of “green marketing” since the early 1990s and to provide a critique of both theory and practice in order to understand how the marketing discipline may yet contribute to progress towards greater sustainability. Design/methodology/approach: The paper examines elements of green marketing theory and practice over the past 15 years by employing the logic of the classic paper from 1985 “Has marketing failed, or was it never really tried” of seeking to identify “false marketings” that have hampered progress. Findings: That much of what has been commonly referred to as “green marketing” has been underpinned by neither a marketing, nor an environmental, philosophy. Five types of misconceived green marketing are identified and analysed: green spinning, green selling, green harvesting, enviropreneur marketing and compliance marketing. Practical implications: Provides an alternative viewpoint on a much researched, but still poorly understood area of marketing, and explains why the anticipated “green revolution” in marketing prefaced by market research findings, has not more radically changed products and markets in practice. Originality/value: Helps readers to understand why progress towards a more sustainable economy has proved so difficult, and outlines some of the more radical changes in thought and practice that marketing will need to adopt before it can make a substantive contribution towards greater sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13522750510619733

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peattie, K., & Crane, A.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
357-370
ISSN
1352-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963591044
Cited by
944
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 42
FWCI
28.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Market Research An International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
Keywords
green marketing, sustainability, greenwashing, sustainable economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review