The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Cross‐cultural social intelligence: An assessment for employees working in cross‐national contexts
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the paper is to discuss the concept of cross‐cultural social intelligence (CCSI), its relevance for both selecting and developing expatriates and other employees working in cross‐cultural contexts, the development of a situational judgment test to assess CCSI, and practical “lessons learned” in each of these areas. Design/methodology/approach The four phases of the development and validation of the CCSI measure (using a total of 184 cross‐cultural SMEs) were developing the scenarios and the response alternatives, the content analysis, and establishing construct validity. Findings The results from the content analysis and construct validation provide support for the use of the CCSI in cross‐cultural situations. Research limitations/implications The CCSI has not yet been validated in a criterion‐related way (i.e. based on relations to job performance). This should be done before using for selection. Practical implications Possible uses for the CCSI in organisations include selection and/or promotion of expatriates and other employees in cross‐cultural contexts and several types of training and development initiatives. This instrument is offered (free of charge) to any interested managers or HR practitioners. Originality/value Despite the expressed need for instruments of this sort, nothing similar currently exists (especially not a theoretically grounded and empirically sound instrument). In addition, the “lessons learned” provide practical advice to others e…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To the extent of our knowledge, however, no SJT specific to ICC presents evidence of criterion validity (Ascalon et al., 2008).”
From Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016) · cites this paper as Ascalon et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“The CCSI itself has somewhat low reliability ( 𝛼 = .68 for the overall, 𝛼 = .61 for the empathy subscale, and 𝛼 = .71 for the ethnocentrism subscale)”
From Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016) · cites this paper as Ascalon et al., 2008
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 56 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- Aiello, A. and Areni, A. (1998), “Un agggiornamento della Scala di De Grada ed altri (1975) per la misura dell'Etnocentrismo (“An updating of the attitude scale of De Grada et al. (1975) for the measurement of ethnocentrism”)”, Rassegna di Psicologia, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 145‐60.
- Bar‐On, R. (2000), “Emotional and social intelligence: insights from the Emotional Quotient Inventory”, in Bar‐On, R. and Parker, J.D.A. (Eds), The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application at Home, School, and in the Workplace, Jossey‐Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA, pp. 363‐88.
- Bhaskar‐Shrinivas, P., Harrison, D.A., Shaffer, M.A. and Luk, D.A. (2004), “What have we learned about expatriate adjustment? Answers accumulated from 23 years of research”, Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY. · DOI
- Bhaskar‐Shrinivas, P., Harrison, D.A., Shaffer, M.A. and Luk, D.A. (2005), “Input‐based and time‐based modes of international adjustment: Meta‐analytic evidence and theoretical extensions”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 257‐81. · DOI
- Black, J.S., Mendenhall, M. and Oddou, G. (1991), “Toward a comprehensive model of international adjustment: an integration of multiple theoretical perspectives”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 291‐317. · DOI
- Born, M.P., Van der Maessen, P.E.A.M. and Van der Zee, K.I. (2001), “A multimedia situational judgment test for social intelligence”, Journal of e.Commerce and Psychology, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 54‐72.
- Brady, D. (2003), “All the world's a call center”, Business Week, Issue 3855, pp. 43‐5.
- Brown, L.T. and Anthony, R.G. (1990), “Continuing the search for social intelligence”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 463‐70. · DOI
- Budner, S. (1962), “Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 29‐50. · DOI
- Burry‐Stock, J.A., Shaw, D.G., Laurie, C. and Chissom, B.S. (1996), “Rater‐agreement indexes for performance assessment”, Educational and Test Measurement, Vol. 56, pp. 251‐62. · DOI
- Caligiuri, P.M. (1997), “Assessing expatriate success: beyond just ‘being there’”, New Approaches to Employee Management, Vol. 4, pp. 117‐40.
- Caligiuri, P.M., Hyland, M.M., Joshi, A. and Bross, A.S. (1998), “Testing a theoretical model for examining the relationship between family adjustment and expatriates' work adjustment”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83 No. 4, pp. 598‐614. · DOI
- Chan, D. and Schmitt, N. (1997), “Video‐based versus paper‐and‐pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 143‐59. · DOI
- DiStefano, J.J. and Maznevski, M.L. (2000), “Creating values with diverse teams in global management”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 45‐63. · DOI
- Doke, D. (2003), “HR helps make the call on overseas centers”, HR Magazine, Vol. 48 No. 7, pp. 74‐80.
- Downing, S.M. and Haladyna, T.M. (1997), “Test item development: validity evidence from quality assurance procedures”, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 61‐82. · DOI
- Dunlap, W.P. and Myers, L. (1997), “Approximating power for significance tests with one degree of freedom”, Psychological Methods, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 186‐91. · DOI
- Earley, P.C. (2002), “Redefining interactions across cultures and organizations: moving forward with cultural intelligence”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24, pp. 271‐99. · DOI
- Ellingsworth, H.W. (1988), “A theory of adaptation in intercultural dyads”, in Kim, Y.Y. and Gudykunst, W.B. (Eds), Theories in Intercultural Communication, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
- Enfield, N.J. (2000), “The theory of cultural logic: how individuals combine social intelligence with semiotics to create and maintain cultural meaning”, Cultural Dynamics, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 35‐64. · DOI
- Gaugler, B.B., Rosenthal, D.B., Thornton, G.C. and Benson, C. (1987), “Meta‐analysis of assessment center validity”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72, pp. 493‐511. · DOI
- Gibby, R.E., Pratt, A.K. and Irwin, J.L. (2006), “Challenges of developing and deploying a global assessment system”, paper presented at Sinar's Practice Forum, Managing Cross‐Cultural Assessment Challenges: Guidance from Experienced Practitioners, 21st Annual SIOP Conference, Dallas, TX, May.
- GMAC Global Relocation Services, National Foreign Trade Council, Inc. and SHRM Global Forum (2004), Global Relocation Trends 2002 Survey Report, Vol. 2002, GMAC Global Relocation Services, East Morristown, NJ.
- Goldberg, L.R. (1999), “A broad‐bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower‐level facets of several five‐factor models”, in Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F. and Ostendorf, F. (Eds), Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 7, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, pp. 7‐28.
- Gudykunst, W.B. (1988), “Uncertainty and anxiety”, in Kim, Y.Y. and Gudykunst, W.B. (Eds), Theories in Intercultural Communication, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
- Hanson, M.A., Horgen, K.E. and Borman, W.C. (1998), “Situational judgment tests as measures of knowledge/expertise”, paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX, April.
- Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work‐related Values, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Javidan, M. and House, R.J. (2001), “Cultural acumen for the global manager: lessons from Project GLOBE”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 289‐305. · DOI · Paper page
- Keating, D.P. (1978), “A search for social intelligence”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 218‐23. · DOI
- Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1976), “Evaluation of training”, in Craig, R.L. (Ed.), Training and Development Handbook, 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
- Lane, H.W., DiStefano, J.J. and Maznevski, M.L. (2000), International Management Behavior: From Policy to Practice, 4th ed., Blackwell, Oxford.
- Lee, J., Wong, C.T., Day, J.D., Maxwell, S.E. and Thorpe, P. (2000), “Social and academic intelligences: a multitrait‐multimethod study of their crystallized and fluid characteristics”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 29, pp. 539‐53. · DOI
- Levin, I.P. (1999), Relating Statistics and Experimental Design, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. · DOI
- McDaniel, M.A., Morgeson, R.P., Finnegan, E.B., Campion, M.A. and Braverman, E.P. (2001), “Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 4, pp. 730‐40. · DOI · Paper page
- Marlowe, H.A. (1986), “Social intelligence: evidence for multidimensionality and construct independence”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 78 No. 1, pp. 52‐8. · DOI
- Mesquita, B. (2001), “Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 68‐74. · DOI
- Nicholson, J.D. and Stepina, L.P. (1998), “Cultural values: a cross national study”, Cross‐Cultural Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 34‐49. · DOI
- Ones, D.S. and Viswesvaran, C. (1999), “Relative importance of personality dimensions for expatriate selection: a policy capturing study”, Human Performance, Vol. 12 Nos 3/4, pp. 275‐94. · DOI
- Ployhart, R.E. and Ryan, A.M. (2000), “A construct‐oriented approach for developing situational judgement tests in a service context”, paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), New Orleans, LA, April.
- Redmond, M.V. (2000), “Cultural distance as a mediating factor between stress and intercultural communication competence”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 24, pp. 151‐9. · DOI
- Roth, K. (2001), “Material culture and intercultural communication”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 25, pp. 563‐80. · DOI
- Salgado, J.F. (1997), “The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European community”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 30‐43. · DOI
- Schwartz, S.H. (1994), “Beyond individualism/collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values”, in Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Kagitçibasi, Ç., Choi, S.C. and Yoon, G. (Eds), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Schwartz, S.H. (1999), “A theory of cultural values and some implications for work”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 48, pp. 23‐48. · DOI · Paper page
- Shenn, J. (2003), “Overseas outsourcing gets a closer look”, American Banker, Vol. 168 No. 216, pp. 6‐10.
- Snyder, M. and Gangestad, S.W. (1986), “On the nature of self‐monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 125‐39. · DOI
- Spector, P.E. (1992), Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction, Sage Publications, London. · DOI
- Thorndike, R.L. and Stein, S. (1937), “An evaluation of the attempts to measure social intelligence”, The Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 275‐85. · DOI
- Triandis, H.C. (2000), “Culture and conflict”, International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 145‐52. · DOI
- Van Oudenhoven, J.P. and Van der Zee, K.I. (2002), “Predicting multicultural effectiveness of international students: the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 679‐94. · DOI
- Weekley, J.A. and Jones, C. (1997), “Video‐based situational testing”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 23‐49. · DOI
- Liu, C., Borg, I. and Spector, P.E. (2004), “Measurement equivalence of the German Job Satisfaction Survey used in a multinational organization: implications of Schwartz's Culture Model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89 No. 6, pp. 1070‐82. · DOI
- Riordan, D.M. and Vandenberg, R.J. (1994), “A central question in cross‐cultural research: do employees of different cultures interpret work‐related measures in an equivalent manner?”, Journal of Management, Vol. 20, pp. 643‐71. · DOI
- Ryan, A.M., Chan, D., Ployhart, R.E. and Slade, L.A. (1999), “Employee attitude surveys in a multinational organization: considering language and culture in assessing measurement equivalence”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 37‐58. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Evelina Ascalon, M., Schleicher, D. J., & Born, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-05-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-130
- ISSN
- 1352-7606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1520336400
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cross Cultural Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- situational judgment tests, expatriate selection, cross-cultural management, small and medium-sized enterprises, construct validity, personnel selection, employee training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross‐cultural social intelligence: An assessment for employees working in cross‐national contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13527600810870570
- The paper
- Evelina Ascalon, M., Schleicher, D. J., & Born, M. P. (2008). Cross‐cultural social intelligence: An assessment for employees working in cross‐national contexts. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600810870570