The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing
Abstract
Layered manufacturing (LM) is emerging as a new manufacturing technology that can enhance the scope of manufacturing. One of the essential tasks in LM is process planning. This paper defines, conceptualizes and reviews the literature in this emerging area. The paper concludes with future projections on the possible directions of research in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools – Research and industrial developments
Flynn, J. M., Shokrani, A., Newman, S. T., & Dhokia, V. (2016) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.11.007 · Cited by 459
An overview of functionally graded additive manufacturing
Loh, G. H., Pei, E., Harrison, D., & Monzón, M. D. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.023 · Cited by 459
Leo Kumar, S. P. (2017) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.08.005 · Cited by 212
Survey on artificial intelligence for additive manufacturing
Yang, J., Chen, Y., Huang, W., & Li, Y. (2017) · 2017 23rd International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) · doi:10.23919/iconac.2017.8082053 · Cited by 73
A statistical method for build orientation determination in additive manufacturing
Zhang, Y., Harik, R., Fadel, G., & Bernard, A. (2019) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-04-2018-0102 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulkarni, P., Marsan, A., & Dutta, D.
- Venue
- Rapid Prototyping Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-35
- ISSN
- 1355-2546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977357018
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13552540010309859
- The paper
- Kulkarni, P., Marsan, A., & Dutta, D. (2000). A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540010309859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
