Cited by 63Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesManufacturing Process and OptimizationAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

A statistical method for build orientation determination in additive manufacturing

Zhang, Yicha, Harik, Ramy, Fadel, Georges, Bernard, Alain·2019·Rapid Prototyping Journal

Abstract

Purpose For part models with complex shape features or freeform shapes, the existing build orientation determination methods may have issues, such as difficulty in defining features and costly computation. To deal with these issues, this paper aims to introduce a new statistical method to develop fast automatic decision support tools for additive manufacturing build orientation determination. Design/methodology/approach The proposed method applies a non-supervised machine learning method, K-Means Clustering with Davies–Bouldin Criterion cluster measuring, to rapidly decompose a surface model into facet clusters and efficiently generate a set of meaningful alternative build orientations. To evaluate alternative build orientations at a generic level, a statistical approach is defined. Findings A group of illustrative examples and comparative case studies are presented in the paper for method validation. The proposed method can help production engineers solve decision problems related to identifying an optimal build orientation for complex and freeform CAD models, especially models from the medical and aerospace application domains with much efficiency. Originality/value The proposed method avoids the limitations of traditional feature-based methods and pure computation-based methods. It provides engineers a new efficient decision-making tool to rapidly determine the optimal build orientation for complex and freeform CAD models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/rpj-04-2018-0102

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These parameters include production path strategies, part locations, and build orientations to enhance the quality and characteristics of the final printed products.

    “These parameters include production path strategies, part locations, and build orientations to enhance the quality and characteristics of the final printed products [425].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Harik, R., Fadel, G., & Bernard, A.
Affiliations
  • Université de technologie de belfort-montbéliard (FR)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • École Centrale de Nantes (FR)
Venue
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-01-07
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
187-207
ISSN
1355-2546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903832848
Cited by
63
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rapid Prototyping Journal (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Keywords
additive manufacturing, K-means clustering, decision support system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review