The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Top surface and side roughness of Inconel 625 parts processed using selective laser melting
Abstract
Purpose: Obtaining the required part top surface roughness and side roughness is critical in some applications. Each of these part properties can often be improved to the detriment of the other during selective laser melting (SLM). The purpose of this paper is to investigate the selective laser melting of Inconel 625 using an Nd:YAG pulsed laser to produce thin wall parts with an emphasis on attaining parts with minimum top surface and side surface roughness. Design/methodology/approach: A full factorial approach was used to vary process parameters and identify a usable Inconel 625 processing region. The effects laser process parameters had on the formation of part surface roughness for multi‐layer parts were examined. Processing parameters that specifically affected top surface and side roughness were identified. Findings: Higher peak powers tended to reduce top surface roughness and reduce side roughness as recoil pressures flatten out the melt pool and reduce balling formation by increasing wettability of the melt. Increased repetition rate and reduced scan speed reduced top surface roughness but increased side roughness. A compromise between attaining a relatively low surface roughness and side roughness can be attained by comparing part surface roughness values and understanding the factors that affect them. A sample with 9 μ m top surface roughness and 10 μ m side roughness was produced. Originality/value: The research is the first of its kind directly processing Inconel 625 using SLM and investigating processing parameters that affect top surface and side roughness simultaneously. It is a useful aid in unveiling a relationship between process parameters and top/side roughness of thin walled parts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties
DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O., Beese, A. M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 · Cited by 8,805
Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications
Yap, C. Y., Chua, C. K., Dong, Z. L., Liu, Z. H., Zhang, D. Q., Loh, L. E., & Sing, S. L. (2015) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4935926 · Cited by 2,353
Ding, D., Pan, Z., Cuiuri, D., & Li, H. (2015) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 · Cited by 1,648
Hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools – Research and industrial developments
Flynn, J. M., Shokrani, A., Newman, S. T., & Dhokia, V. (2016) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.11.007 · Cited by 459
Tian, Y., Tomus, D., Rometsch, P., & Wu, X. (2017) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.010 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Mumtaz, K., & Hopkinson, N.
- Venue
- Rapid Prototyping Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-03-27
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-103
- ISSN
- 1355-2546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992486005
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top surface and side roughness of Inconel 625 parts processed using selective laser melting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13552540910943397
- The paper
- Mumtaz, K., & Hopkinson, N. (2009). Top surface and side roughness of Inconel 625 parts processed using selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540910943397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.