The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurial small firms
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explore SME capacity to absorb and manage knowledge as a prior condition to the successful adoption of innovations and entrepreneurial growth. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on the findings from more than 1,500 SME owners across regular quarterly SERTeam surveys and from other large scale studies, this article examines the effects of experiential and formal knowledge on the development of SME absorptive capacity. Findings: There were significant age, educational and size effects that influence SME acquisition and assimilation of knowledge. Primarily, it is the small firms of 15+ employees that have the capacity to absorb and use new knowledge – especially those with higher educational levels and clear growth objectives. These firms are not startups but they do tend to be younger firms with younger founders. Practical implications: Given the main policy aim is the development of clusters and of knowledge‐based firms, policy makers should focus on SMEs recently started by graduates or people with technical qualifications; educators need to develop technology and innovation management programmes for these firms. Originality/value: This article makes an important contribution to the identification of priorities for public SME development support and areas where business schools and enterprise trainers could maximise their economic and developmental impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Information technology adoption in small business: Confirmation of a proposed framework
Nguyen, T. H., Newby, M., & Macaulay, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12058 · Cited by 274
Caputo, F., Cillo, V., Candelo, E., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2018-0833 · Cited by 199
Harvey, G., Skelcher, C., Spencer, E., Jas, P., & Walshe, K. (2010) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030902817923 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 345-360
- ISSN
- 1355-2554 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093903583
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.