Cited by 111Innovation and Knowledge ManagementPublic Policy and Administration ResearchOrganizational Learning and Leadership

Absorptive Capacity in a Non-Market Environment: A knowledge-based approach to analysing the performance of sector organizations

Harvey, Gill, Skelcher, Chris, Spencer, Eileen, Jas, Pauline, Walshe, Kieran·2010·Public Management Review

Abstract

Improved performance by public sector organizations is a political imperative in numerous countries. There are particular challenges in turnaround of poorly performing organizations. Theoretical explanations of the performance trajectories of public organizations, and especially the causes of failure, highlight the importance of knowledge processes, often from an organizational learning perspective. Absorptive capacity provides an alternative way of theorizing the relationships between organizational performance and knowledge processes, derived from the resource-based view of the firm and the broader concept of dynamic capabilities. The article reviews the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological implications of applying absorptive capacity to the performance of public organizations. It concludes that the approach has value and presents a number of propositions to be tested through empirical study, alongside some more general challenges for researchers who wish to study the concept further. The high political salience of public organizations' performance, and the costs of failure, mandates a major research effort on these issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14719030902817923

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Public organisations generally control large societal resources both in terms of workforce and tangible assets such as land, buildings, infrastructure, etc.

    “Public organisations generally control large societal resources both in terms of workforce and tangible assets such as land, buildings, infrastructure, etc. (Clausen, Demircioglu, & Alsos, 2020;Harvey, Skelcher, Spencer, Jas, & Walshe, 2010).”

    From AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda (2023) · cites this paper as Harvey, Skelcher, Spencer, Jas, & Walshe, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, G., Skelcher, C., Spencer, E., Jas, P., & Walshe, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Harvey, Gill
  • Skelcher, Chris
  • Spencer, Eileen
  • Jas, Pauline
  • Walshe, Kieran
Venue
Public Management Review
Published
2010-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
77-97
ISSN
  • 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-9037
  • 1471-9045
OpenAlex
W1918593213
Cited by
111
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
Keywords
absorptive capacity, public sector organizations, organizational performance, knowledge processes, organizational learning, resource-based view, dynamic capabilities, corporate turnaround, performance trajectories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review