The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility via the examination of Waitrose, a leading UK food retailer. These two concepts differ substantially and illustrate contrasting approaches in terms of social responsibility development and application. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative case study methodology is used where managers from Waitrose and its suppliers, industry experts and representatives from professional bodies are interviewed. An observation of an ethical audit with a Waitrose supplier was also conducted. Findings: Findings show an example of good practice in the area of corporate social responsibility in the supply chain and illustrate the substantive progress that can be made in achieving supply chain responsibility. At the same time, the paper provides the specific challenges in developing from a corporate social watchdog approach to one in which the power in the chain is more balanced and where a holistic approach requires to be taken to achieve social responsibility. Originality/value: Considering the scarcity of work examining empirically the issue of corporate social responsibility in food supply chains, this study demonstrates an evolutionary process and its stages based on an examination of Waitrose's supply chain and the corporate social responsibility approach it has taken with its suppliers. The authors also illustrate a range of key implications that need to be considered by both managers and policy makers and it provides a range of areas where further research is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Supply Chain Specific? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives
Roberts, S. (2003) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1023395631811 · Cited by 472
Cooper, R. W., Frank, G. L., & Kemp, R. A. (1997) · European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management · doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(97)00013-0 · Cited by 30
Cited by
Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0106 · Cited by 688
A field-level examination of the adoption of sustainable procurement in the social housing sector
Meehan, J., & Bryde, D. J. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-07-2014-0359 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Spence, L., & Bourlakis, M.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-06-19
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-302
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073501651
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.