The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethical fashion: myth or future trend?
Abstract
Abstract Purpose – The aim is to contribute to a better understanding of ethical fashion consumption. Even though consumers demand more ethical responsibility from companies, it is debatable if consumers would sacrifice their own personal needs to support ethically produced clothing. Design/methodology/approach – Focus groups are conducted in the UK and Germany in order to elicit consumers' beliefs and attitudes towards ethical issues in the fashion industry and its effect on purchase behaviour. Questionnaires are administrated to verify the outcome of the focus groups. Findings – The findings from this research demonstrate little evidence that ethical issues have any effect on consumers' fashion purchase behaviour. When it comes to fashion purchase, personal needs motivate consumers primarily to buy garments and take precedence over ethical issues. Research limitations/implications – Only a specific age group between 18 and 26‐years‐old is interviewed. Both research methods are undertaken in the area of Manchester, England, and the area of Frankfurt, Germany, which perhaps limits the meaning of the results. Practical implications – Consumers feel that they are often unable to make an ethical choice. Therefore they do seem to need more information to allow them to make better ethical judgements and there is a role for ethical fashion companies to communicate this more effectively. Originality/value – This research paper gives insight into ethical fashion purchasing behaviour among UK and German consumers and provides information to improve the potential of ethical fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9 · Cited by 891
Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J., & Battenfeld, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320 · Cited by 330
Factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention of green sportswear
Nam, C., Dong, H., & Lee, Y.-A. (2017) · Fashion and Textiles · doi:10.1186/s40691-017-0091-3 · Cited by 197
Brandão, A., & Costa, A. G. D. (2021) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2020-0306 · Cited by 168
Neumann, H. L., Martinez, L. M., & Martinez, L. F. (2021) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-11-2019-0405 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Joergens, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 360-371
- ISSN
- 1361-2026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996041480
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethical fashion: myth or future trend? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13612020610679321
- The paper
- Joergens, C. (2006). Ethical fashion: myth or future trend? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610679321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.