Extending the theory of planned behaviour to understand the effects of barriers towards sustainable fashion consumption
Abstract
Purpose Extending the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), this paper aims to measure the relative importance of different barriers to sustainable fashion consumption (SFC). Design/methodology/approach Existing studies have mainly adopted a qualitative methodology for identifying barriers to uptake of SFC, this study uses six of the main identified barriers: environmental apparel knowledge, perceived value, price sensitivity, product attributes and variety, availability and scepticism into the TPB framework to test and reveal which barriers have the greater impact on the TPB cognitions and consequently on building intention towards SFC. To test this model a survey study among 669 consumers from Europe, Asian and North America was conducted, structural equation modelling is used to test the research hypotheses. Findings Findings confirm the role of TPB cognitions on predicting intention and show that the proposed barriers provide a satisfactory explanation of the TPB model. Furthermore, results show that product attributes and variety and environmental apparel knowledge have the greatest impact on the TPB cognitions and on building intention towards SFC. Differences were found between the impacts of the price for the three continents. Originality/value This research contributes to the emerging sustainable fashion literature by examining the impact of different barriers to SFC in an extended TPB framework. To the best of our knowledge price sensitivity, availability and scepticis…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of ethical labelling researchers have assumed that they are dealing with a structured consumer durable evaluation and decision process.
“the majority of ethical labelling researchers have assumed quite reasonably that they are dealing with a structured consumer durable evaluation and decision process [32].”
From Marketing Tactics for Sustainable Fashion and the Circular Economy: The Impact of Ethical Labels on Fast Fashion Choice (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 124 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Brandão, A., & Costa, A. G. D.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- ORCID
- Brandão, Amélia
- Venue
- European Business Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-02-24
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 742-774
- ISSN
- 0955-534X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3131942914
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 19.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Business Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- sustainable fashion consumption, theory of planned behavior, barriers to sustainable consumption, purchase intention, perceived value, price sensitivity, product attributes, product variety, availability, skepticism, cross-cultural consumer differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review