Cited by 140Higher Education and EmployabilityGenerational Differences and TrendsEmployer Branding and e-HRM

Generation Y and career choice: The impact of retail career perceptions, expectations and entitlement perceptions

Hurst, Jessica L., Good, Linda K.·2009·Career Development International

Abstract

Purpose: The transition from higher education to employment is a major life change for many college seniors (currently, the Generation Y cohort). The purpose of this paper is to enhance the understanding of Generation Y and to present new insights regarding Gen Y's retail career expectations, perceptions of retail careers, future psychological contract/entitlement perceptions of retail careers, and career exploration of the US retailing industry. Design/methodology/approach: Utilizing quantitative research methods via an on‐line survey, the authors examined 193 Gen Y college seniors' retail career perceptions and expectations, and explored the influence these factors have on future psychological contract/entitlement perceptions of employer‐employee obligations and retail career exploration from nine US universities. Findings: College seniors' pre‐entry retail job expectations, perceptions of retail careers, and future psychological contract/entitlement perceptions of employee obligations were significant predictors of career exploration; college seniors' preconceived notions of retail careers, combined with what they feel they would owe their future employer, are instrumental in determining retail career exploration decisions. Research limitations/implications: Findings suggest directions for university faculty, academic advisors, and industry practitioners on facilitating college seniors' transitions from higher education to the world of work by suggesting recruitment strategies that can attract, retain and motivate Gen Y. Originality/value: The findings provide useful criteria for organizational development strategies to assist with the transition from higher education to the workforce and may also improve the success of recruiting Gen Y employees. In addition, the conceptualization of psychological contracts (i.e. entitlement perceptions) differentiates this study from prior psychological contract research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13620430910997303

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurst, J. L., & Good, L. K.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Career Development International
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-10-30
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
570-593
ISSN
1362-0436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1509283664
Cited by
140
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Career Development International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
millennials, career choice, career expectations, career exploration, psychological contract, college seniors, school-to-work transition, employee recruitment and retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review