The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Organising communities‐of‐practice: facilitating emergence
Abstract
Purpose: The notion of communities of practice (CoP) has received great attention in educational and organisational practice and research. Although the concept originally refers to collaborative practices that emerge naturally, educational and HRD practitioners are increasingly searching for ways to create these practices intentionally in order to stimulate learning and professional development in specific fields. This paper aims to gain insight into ways in which communities of practice can be deliberately organised. Design/methodology/approach: The study concerns a multiple case study of the deliberate initiation of 15 communities of practice of small and medium‐sized companies in the tourist sector, located in seven European countries. The analysis focuses on how meaningful, shared and coordinative activity is organised in each of the 15 cases. A multiple case study allowed for comparison between the various cases in order to target fruitful conditions and actions in organisation processes. Findings: In the initiation of a CoP it is important that before an outsider starts to organise and coordinate activities questions such as “How are we relevant to one another?” and “Who are we and where are we going?” are answered first, and by the group itself. These questions relate to the development of meaningful activity (domain) and of shared activity (community). Following this, any coordinative system, any practice, should be subordinated to the motives of the group. Originality/value: Besides identifying various actions for human resource developers who aim to apply the concept of CoP in professional work, the study contributes to the scientific formulation of pedagogical notions around communities of practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Besides a common goal, it is necessary that members of such a community share activities to actually feel connected.
“Besides a common goal, it is necessary that members of such a community share activities to actually feel connected (Wenger 1998; Akkerman et al. 2008).”
From Work engagement in health professions education (2017) · cites this paper as Akkerman et al. 2008
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 71
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Akkerman, S., Van den Bossche, P., Admiraal, W., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Simons, R.J. and Kirschner, P. (2007), “Reconsidering group cognition: from conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio‐cultural perspectives?”, Educational Research Review, Vol. 2, pp. 39‐63. · DOI
- Burt, R.S. (1992), Structural Holes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI · Paper page
- Filius, R. (2007), “Communities of practice. Leren van en met elkaar (“Communities of practice. Learning from and with each other”)”, Opleiding en Ontwikkeling, Vol. 20, pp. 22‐7.
- Geertz, C. (1973), “Thick description: toward an interpretative theory of culture”, in Geertz, C. (Ed.), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York, NY.
- Hildreth, P. and Kimble, C. (2004), “Communities of practice: going one step too far?”, Proceedings 9e colloque de l'AIM, Evry, 7 May.
- Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H. (1993), “Collective mind in organisations: heedful interrelating on flight decks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, pp. 357‐81. · DOI
- Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. · DOI · Paper page
- Wenger, E. (1999), “Learning as a social system”, Systems Thinker, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 2‐3.
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R. and Snyder, W. (2002), Cultivating Communities of Practice, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
- Akkerman, S. (2006), “Onderzoeker zijn, worden en blijven” (“Being a researcher, becoming and staying)”, Develop, Vol. 2, pp. 35‐41.
- De Laat, M. and Simons, P.R.J. (2002), “Collective learning: theoretical perspectives and ways to support networked learning”, Vocational Training: European Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 13‐24.
- Renninger, K. and Shumar, W. (Eds) (2002), Building Virtual Communities: Learning and Change in Cyberspace, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Akkerman, S., Petter, C., & de Laat, M.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Venue
- Journal of Workplace Learning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-08-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 383-399
- ISSN
- 1366-5626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109887791
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Workplace Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- communities of practice, emergence, small and medium-sized enterprises, tourism industry, professional development, human resource development, meaningful activities, shared activities, workplace learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review