Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of learning and working climate on the retention of talented employees

Open access
Govaerts, Natalie, Kyndt, Eva, Dochy, Filip, Baert, Herman·2011·Journal of Workplace Learning

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of employee and organizational factors, such as learning and working climate, on the retention of talented employees. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire was administered to 972 employees. Explorative factor analysis was performed to reduce the number of variables and to look for underlying constructs in the data. Secondly, using multiple stepwise regression analysis the influence of the factors on retention was examined. Thirdly, ANOVA’s were calculated to compare retention in different kinds of groups of employees. Findings – Retention was reflected by two factors, namely ‘intention to stay’ and ‘intention to leave’. Results showed the significant influence of learning and working climate on worker’s intention to stay. The learning and working climate also had an influence on the intention to leave, although less substantive. Other predictors of intention to stay were age, leadership skills, learning attitude and creativity, and the use of procedures within the organisation. In order to predict the intention to leave, learning attitude and creativity were excluded from the regression model. ANOVA’s only revealed differences for ‘high potentials’ and seniority regarding the intention to stay. Originality/value – This research has shown that learning and working climate has a significant influence on employee’s intention to stay and in a lesser amount on intention to leave. The influence of learning and working climate on retention of talented employees should therefore not be underestimated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13665621111097245

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Govaerts, N., Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Baert, H.
Venue
Journal of Workplace Learning
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-02-22
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
35-55
ISSN
1366-5626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970964802
Cited by
280
References
1
FWCI
20.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.