The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle
Abstract
The main aim of the paper is to examine some of the strategies that can be matched to increase the effectiveness of the knowledge development cycle. In manufacturing and operational works, the effectiveness of different organizing strategies to enhance the quality of manufacturing processes and products is well established. In knowledge works, however, we lack such frameworks. Unlike manufacturing and operational processes, knowledge development processes are often chaotic, unstructured, and unsystematic, resulting in intangible products. Therefore, the principles of manufacturing strategies cannot be applied in the knowledge development cycle. In knowledge works, organizing strategies should be defined and initiated based on knowledge development phases (e.g. knowledge creation, knowledge adoption, knowledge distribution, and knowledge review and revision). Each phase, in the knowledge development cycle, needs to be evaluated in context of its characteristics on repetition, standardization, reliability, and specifications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,614
The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation
(1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(97)80234-x · Cited by 13,156
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
POLANYI, M. (1997) · Knowledge in Organisations · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,408
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,433
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Cited by
Don’t Be Fooled: The Misinformation Effect of Explanations in Human–AI Collaboration
Spitzer, P., Holstein, J., Morrison, K., Holstein, K., Satzger, G., & Kühl, N. (2026) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2574511 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhatt, G. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-26
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030823974
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 33.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13673270010315371
- The paper
- Bhatt, G. D. (2000). Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010315371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
