The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people
Abstract
Argues that the knowledge management process can be categorized into knowledge creation, knowledge validation, knowledge presentation, knowledge distribution, and knowledge application activities. To capitalize on knowledge, an organization must be swift in balancing its knowledge management activities. In general, such a balancing act requires changes in organizational culture, technologies, and techniques. A number of organizations believe that by focusing exclusively on people, technologies, or techniques, they can manage knowledge. However, that exclusive focus on people, technologies, or techniques does not enable a firm to sustain its competitive advantages. It is, rather, the interaction between technology, techniques, and people that allow an organization to manage its knowledge effectively. By creating a nurturing and “learning‐by‐doing” kind of environment, an organization can sustain its competitive advantages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Cited by
Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI
Jarrahi, M. H., Askay, D., Eshraghi, A., & Smith, P. (2023) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2022.03.002 · Cited by 604
Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 · Cited by 560
Characterizing knowledge management in the small business environment
Yew Wong, K., & Aspinwall, E. (2004) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270410541033 · Cited by 498
Managing knowledge: the link between culture and organizational learning
Pérez López, S., Manuel Montes Peón, J., & José Vázquez Ordás, C. (2004) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270410567657 · Cited by 484
The role of organizational culture in the knowledge management process
Chang, C. L.-H., & Lin, T.-C. (2015) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-08-2014-0353 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhatt, G. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-75
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109361508
- Cited by
- 1,215
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13673270110384419
- The paper
- Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.