Cited by 9Elder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesCriminal Justice and Penology

Training in joint investigation of alleged crimes against people with learning disabilities in Northern Ireland

McAllister, Anne, Bailey, Andrew, Barr, Owen·2002·The Journal of Adult Protection

Abstract

This paper reports on the evaluation of a training event conducted by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) and the Homefirst Community Trust. Participants' attitudes were measured prior to and following the training, which was designed to increase awareness of the knowledge and skills necessary for effective joint investigations of alleged crimes against vulnerable adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/14668203200200012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAllister, A., Bailey, A., & Barr, O.
Affiliations
  • Police Service of Northern Ireland (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Adult Protection
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
21-27
ISSN
1466-8203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034205214
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Adult Protection (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
joint investigation, learning disabilities, police training, police-community partnership, adult protection, Police Service of Northern Ireland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review