Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 830

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation

Darroch, Jenny, McNaughton, Rod·2002·Journal of Intellectual Capital
DOI 10.1108/14691930210435570
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The management of knowledge is frequently identified as an important antecedent of innovation. However, very little empirical research has specifically addressed antecedents and consequences of effective knowledge management. Using data collected from 443 New Zealand firms, a knowledge management instrument, which comprises three components and 16 factors, is regressed against a three‐factor innovation scale that captures incremental innovation, innovation that changes consumers’ behaviour and innovation that destroys existing competencies. The results of this research show that knowledge acquisition and responsiveness to knowledge are more important for innovation than knowledge dissemination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/14691930210435570

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barczak, G. (1991), “Communications patterns of new product development team leaders”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 101‐9. · doi:10.1109/17.78406
  2. Bontis, N. (1996), “There’s a price on your head: managing intellectual capital strategically”, Business Quarterly, Summer, pp. 40‐7.
  3. Darroch, J. and McNaughton, R. (2001a), “Developing a measure of knowledge management” in Bontis, N. (Ed.), Organizational Intelligence: The Cutting Edge of Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management, Butterworth‐Heinemann/KMCI Press, Boston, MA. · DOI
  4. Hamel, G. (1998), “Strategy innovation”, Executive Excellence, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 7‐8.
  5. Kleinschmidt, E.J. and Cooper, R.G. (1995), “The relative importance of new product success determinants – perception versus reality”, R&D Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 281‐98. · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1995.tb00919.x

Cited by

See all 830

Metadata

Authors
Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Capital
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
210-222
ISSN
1469-1930 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/14691930210435570
OpenAlex
W2049156859
Cited by
830
References
58
FWCI
27.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14691930210435570
The paper
Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930210435570

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.