The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure: An empirical analysis
Abstract
In recent years a world‐wide debate has emerged on the future of business reporting. There is growing agreement that traditional financial reporting is inadequate in meeting with the information needs of stakeholders, particularly in a knowledge economy characterised by a rapidly emerging emphasis on intellectual capital (IC). This study examines voluntary intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) provided by listed Italian companies in annual reports from the year 2001. The study aims to answer two research questions namely: what is the amount and content of ICD; and what are the factors that influence different voluntary reporting behaviours. In relation to amount and content of information disclosed, the results are consistent with previous ICD studies showing extensive disclosure of external capital (in particular about “customers”). Regarding the factors that can explain different voluntary reporting practices, findings suggest that industry and size are not important in determining the content of information disclosed, however, as found in social and environmental disclosure (SED) studies, these factors are relevant in explaining the amount of information disclosed. In summary, this paper highlights the ICD practices of Italian listed companies by examining their annual reports, and compares these results with a number of previous national studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0 · Cited by 8,097
Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis
Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513579910270138 · Cited by 1,425
Cited by
Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting
Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691930410533704 · Cited by 1,253
Self-citationReflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research
Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2012.03.004 · Cited by 698
Self-citationContent analysis of social, environmental reporting: what is new?
Guthrie, J., & Abeysekera, I. (2006) · Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting · doi:10.1108/14013380610703120 · Cited by 503
Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570710741028 · Cited by 415
Human capital, value creation and disclosure
Beattie, V., & Smith, S. J. (2010) · Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting · doi:10.1108/14013381011105957 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Bozzolan, S., Favotto, F., & Ricceri, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Capital
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 543-558
- ISSN
- 1469-1930 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1512719523
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure: An empirical analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14691930310504554
- The paper
- Bozzolan, S., Favotto, F., & Ricceri, F. (2003). Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure: An empirical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310504554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.