Ergonomic solutions for an aging workforce
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to focus on obstacles faced by older workers in the workplace and provide three main ergonomic solutions designed to mitigate and prevent age‐related injuries. Design/methodology/approach Research methodology includes a comprehensive literature review to identify issues, best practices, and improvements for ergonomic conditions in the workplace, especially those impacting aging workers. Findings Solutions presented include strategies for reducing extreme joint movement, reducing extreme pressure, and reducing repetitive tasks. Examples of engineering improvements, administrative improvements, and safety equipment additions are also presented. Practical implications This paper provides ergonomic solutions and examines the importance of providing effective workplace ergonomics for the older worker. The examples demonstrated can be directly applied by facility planners and managers who wish to create safe and productive working environments. Originality/value With an increasing percentage of older workers compromising that workforce, it is critical that companies and workplace managers make effective workplace ergonomics a top priority. The paper focuses on the role of the facility manager in implementing ergonomic solutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental factors such as noise, vibrations, and high temperatures, along with organizational conditions such as work stress, lack of adequate breaks, and intense work rhythms, exacerbate these risks.
“Asimismo, factores ambientales como ruido, vibraciones y altas temperaturas, junto con condiciones organizacionales como el estrés laboral, la falta de pausas adecuadas y ritmos de trabajo intensos, exacerban estos riesgos [32], [33], [34].”
From Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review
Campos-Naval, J. E., Castañeda-López, V. A., & Aparicio-Ballena, J. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 23rd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI): "Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Sustainable Technologies in service of society" · doi:10.18687/laccei2025.1.1.802
- Authors
- Roper, K. O., & Yeh, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Facilities Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-07-17
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172-178
- ISSN
- 1472-5967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972306169
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Facilities Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Keywords
- aging workforce, older workers, workplace ergonomics, pressure reduction, repetitive work, engineering controls, safety equipment, facility management, occupational safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review