The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent and nature of greening the supply chain (SC) in the UK manufacturing sector; and the factors that influence the breadth and depth of this activity. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the findings from a sample of manufacturing organisations drawn from the membership of The Chartered Institute for Purchasing and Supply. Data are collected using a questionnaire, piloted and pre‐tested before distribution with responses from 60 manufacturing companies. Findings: On average manufacturers perceive the greatest pressure to improve environmental performance through legislation and internal drivers (IDs). The least influential pressures are related to societal drivers and SC pressures from individual customers. Green supply chain management (GSCM) practices amongst this “average” group of UK manufacturing organisations are focusing on internal, higher risk, descriptive activities, rather than proactive, external engagement processes. Environmental attitude (EA) is a key predictor of GSCM activity and those organisations that have a progressive attitude are also operationally very active. EA shows some relationship to legislative drivers but other factors are also influential. Operational activity may also be moderated by organisational contingencies such as risk, size, and nationality. Research limitations/implications: The main limitation to this paper is the relatively small manufacturing sample. Practical implications: This paper presents a series of constructs that identify GSCM operational activities companies to benchmark themselves against. It suggests which factors are driving these operational changes and how industry contingencies may be influential. Originality/value: This paper explores what is driving environmental behaviour amongst an “average” sample of manufacturers, what specific management practices take place and the relationships between them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,866
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · Cited by 6,341
DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x · Cited by 5,121
A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030810882816 · Cited by 4,085
Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review
Srivastava, S. K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · Cited by 3,984
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005 · Cited by 2,761
Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities
Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574099810805807 · Cited by 2,435
Sustainable supply chains: An introduction
Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012 · Cited by 1,746
Cited by
Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 · Cited by 2,131
A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics
Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042 · Cited by 1,068
Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035 · Cited by 1,019
An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management
Diabat, A., & Govindan, K. (2011) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.002 · Cited by 938
Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review
Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541211258591 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-09-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 933-956
- ISSN
- 1741-038X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029157403
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 42.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17410380910984212
- The paper
- Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380910984212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.