The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do women in top management affect firm performance?A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to examine the relationship between management diversity and firm performance in the case of women in top executive jobs and on boards of directors. Corporate governance literature argues that board diversity is potentially positively related to firm performance. This hypothesis is tested in the paper. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper with the use of data for the 2,500 largest Danish firms observed during the period 1993‐2001 various statistical models for firm performance are specified and estimated. The main focus in the models is the estimated relationship between the proportion of women in top management (CEOs and on boards of directors) and firm performance. Findings: The results in this paper show that the proportion of women in top management jobs tends to have positive effects on firm performance, even after controlling for numerous characteristics of the firm and direction of causality. The results show that the positive effects of women in top management strongly depend on the qualifications of female top managers. Originality/value: This paper provides solid statistical evidence of the effects of women in top management on firm performance. The use of a large sample and the panel nature of the data set make it possible to properly control for direction of causality and, furthermore, much firm and individual information is included to estimate genuine effects of women in top management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”
Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6 · Cited by 1,039
Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9 · Cited by 536
Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence
Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2021) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.2089 · Cited by 473
Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption?
Atif, M., Hossain, M., Alam, M. S., & Goergen, M. (2021) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101665 · Cited by 434
Jeong, S.-H., & Harrison, D. A. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0716 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 569-593
- ISSN
- 0043-8022 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0401
- OpenAlex
- W2613886320
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do women in top management affect firm performance?A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17410400610702160
- The paper
- Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance?A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610702160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.