The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis
Abstract
Purpose: This paper seeks to review the current literature in order to explore how performance of leadership in project management determines project outcomes. The specific causes of project success or failure have been an area of much debate in the project management literature. Performance of leadership has been cited as a critical success factor, determining either the success or failure of a project. Design/methodology/approach: An extensive literature review has been undertaken to explore our understanding of how project leadership performance impacts on project outcome. Findings: The mechanisms through which leadership may impact on outcomes are considered. Implications include the need for project managers to prioritize training in leadership skills, and the need for continuous professional improvement to enhance leadership outcomes. No single leadership model is appropriate throughout the duration of the project. Performance, therefore, must be modified to align with the stages of the project duration. Research limitations/implications: While the literature has given meaningful insights into leadership of projects, there has been little research into performance management of project leadership. The work is the basis of developing a research agenda and establishing a conceptual framework. The opportunity exists, based on this work, for carrying out research on project leadership performance and its effect on project outcomes. Practical implications: Insightful learning has been achieved into project leadership and the failing of practitioners in appropriate training and development at various stages of the projects life cycle. Social implications: Projects and project‐based management, delivered nationally and internationally, are of significant importance to organizations. Increasing understanding of the implications of leadership performance, therefore, is of critical importance. Originality/value: The literature review has identified significant limitation in project leadership performance management. It is anticipated that this work will trigger further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations
Longshore, J. M., & Bass, B. M. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258081 · Cited by 12,412
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide)
Pmbok (2004) · Cited by 4,316
Atkinson, R. (1999) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00069-6 · Cited by 2,359
The “real” success factors on projects
Cooke-Davies, T. (2002) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00067-9 · Cited by 1,837
Teaching Smart People How to Learn
ARGYRIS, C. (2000) · Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7223-8.50015-0 · Cited by 1,408
Kirkpatick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.1991.4274679 · Cited by 1,328
A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects
Belassi, W., & Tukel, O. I. (1996) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00064-x · Cited by 1,187
Goleman, D. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 1,164
Cited by
Ali, M., Zhang, L., Shah, S. J., Khan, S., & Shah, A. M. (2020) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-05-2019-0230 · Cited by 123
Hughes, D. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Simintiras, A. C. (2016) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2016.1217571 · Cited by 120
Virtual Team Leader Communication: Employee Perception and Organizational Reality
Newman, S. A., Ford, R. C., & Marshall, G. W. (2020) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/2329488419829895 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Nixon, P., Harrington, M., & Parker, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-01-13
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-216
- ISSN
- 0043-8022 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0401
- OpenAlex
- W2070461689
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 19.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17410401211194699
- The paper
- Nixon, P., Harrington, M., & Parker, D. (2012). Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211194699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.