Cited by 85Education and Military IntegrationMilitary and Defense StudiesDisability Education and Employment

“No man's land”: the transition to civilian life

Brunger, Helen, Serrato, Jonathan, Ogden, Jane·2013·Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research

Abstract

Purpose: Ex‐service personnel face numerous and significant problems upon discharge from the forces. The purpose of this paper is to explore experiences of the transition from military to civilian life and to identify some of the barriers and facilitators to re‐employment. Design/methodology/approach: In‐depth interviews were carried out with 11 ex‐servicemen who had previously served in the UK armed forces and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Findings: Participants described their experiences in terms of three broad themes: characteristics of a military life; loss as experienced upon return to civilian life; and the attempt to bridge the gap between these two lives. Transcending these themes was the notion of identity, illustrating that the transition from military to civilian life can be viewed as a shift in sense of self from soldier to civilian. Research limitations/implications: The current study only recruited male ex‐service personnel and therefore the findings may not accurately represent the experiences of female service leavers. Practical implications: The military needs to ensure that not only is support provided for all service personnel, but that it goes beyond basic vocational advice. Although the needs of ex‐service personnel are defined by factors other than unemployment, such as trauma or the sudden loss of security, they do relate back to unemployment in some capacity. Methodological changes to the discharge process could help this population to achieve a more continuous trajectory rather than a fragmented one. Originality/value: The present study has provided further insight into the identity experiences of ex‐service personnel along their journey from soldier to civilian. Breakwell's Identity Process Theory provided a valuable framework for understanding the experiences of ex‐service personnel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17596591311313681

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunger, H., Serrato, J., & Ogden, J.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
86-100
ISSN
1759-6599 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058886672
Cited by
85
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military and Defense Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
transition to civilian life, ex-service personnel, military discharge, reemployment, unemployment, identity, selfhood, loss, military life, identity process theory, veterans, barriers and facilitators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review