The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of four decades of scholarly lean literature and identify phases of lean while highlighting core knowledge and voids from within the scholarly lean literature. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology applied to better understand lean over the past four decades was a systematic review of literature, as described by Machi and McEvoy in The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Findings: This literature review has synthesized and categorized four decades of scholarly literature, along with influential books from credible researchers and practitioners of lean, in an effort to decipher the lean thinking paradigm from jargon to a commonly‐shared language. In total, five themes evolved from the analysis starting with the Discovery phase (1970‐1990), Dissemination phase (1991‐1996), Implementation phase (1997‐2000), Enterprise phase (2001‐2005), and the most recent phase of Performance (2006‐2009). Research limitations/implications: The literature review was limited to articles available to the researcher using search terms restricted to: lean manufacturing, lean production, lean thinking, lean and review, lean and Toyota Production System, lean assessment, lean culture, lean transformation. The databases accessed through EBSCO were: Academic Source Premier, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO. Originality/value: Publications tracing the lineage of lean over the past four decades are sparse, based on lean scholarly literature, exposing a void in the knowledge base. This literature review should assist other scholars and practitioners who are interested in substantiating their lean endeavours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2004) · Cited by 3,245
Defining and developing measures of lean production
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019 · Cited by 2,399
Lean Thinking—Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967 · Cited by 2,122
Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking
Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570410558049 · Cited by 1,664
The genealogy of lean production
Holweg, M. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.001 · Cited by 1,480
SUGIMORI, Y., KUSUNOKI, K., CHO, F., & UCHIKAWA, S. (1977) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207547708943149 · Cited by 1,327
Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System
Spear, S. J., & Bowen, H. K. (1999) · Harvard business review · Cited by 1,321
Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance
Cua, K. O., McKone, K. E., & Schroeder, R. G. (2001) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00066-3 · Cited by 1,152
A Study of the Toyota Production System From an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint
Shingo, S., & Bodek, N. (2019) · doi:10.4324/9781315136509 · Cited by 1,064
Organization change: theory and practice
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-4533 · Cited by 1,037
Cited by
Lean and green combine to impact environmental and operational performance
Inman, R. A., & Green, K. W. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1447705 · Cited by 259
Lean practices and their effect on performance: a literature review
Negrão, L. L. L., Godinho Filho, M., & Marodin, G. (2016) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2016.1231853 · Cited by 243
Antony, J., Psomas, E., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Hines, P. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1776410 · Cited by 116
Total productive maintenance (TPM) implementation practice: A literature review and directions
Jain, A., Bhatti, R., & Singh, H. (2014) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-06-2013-0032 · Cited by 148
Research gaps in Lean manufacturing: a systematic literature review
Psomas, E., & Antony, J. (2019) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-12-2017-0260 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, K. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-06-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 112-132
- ISSN
- 2040-4166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008933880
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/20401461211243702
- The paper
- Stone, K. B. (2012). Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461211243702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.