Measuring and building lean thinking for value creation in supply chains
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop a standardised instrument to measure the impact of lean thinking on supply chain value. This tool can be used to examine supply chain readiness and thus enhance overall value. It can also observe the potential role of customers, competitors and suppliers in increasing supply chain performance. Design/methodology/approach: A survey of previous studies is undertaken in the Egyptian industrial sector. The study also uses a questionnaire provided across all managerial levels of Egyptian firms. This questionnaire is divided into two main sections: the first section is considered to be about lean thinking stages for waste elimination, namely muri, mura and muda, while the second section relates to the value creation dimensions. Findings: The developed instrument accesses and analyses different types of lean thinking for identifying lean degree in supply chains. Consequently, it could lead to enhancing value creation in supply chains. This explorative study also indicates that the Egyptian industrial sector is willing to go lean. Research limitations/implications: Some limitations exist in this study. First, the survey was conducted on the Egyptian industrial sector. The applicability of the proposed scale should thus be further tested in different countries and service mixtures. Practical implications: Internal resistance is more of a barrier than external (customers, suppliers or competitors) resistance to lean thinking. Thus, organisations should focus first on internal (functional) integration and then move on to interorganisational integration. Further, people are more critical than technology in implementing lean thinking. Originality/value: There is little empirical research on the implementation of lean thinking. Practitioners and researchers should find value in this unique instrument.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizations in developing countries lack organizational and governmental support.
“Organizations in developing countries also lack organizational and governmental support (Sangwan etal. ,2014;Shamah,2013;WongandWong,2011;Pearce etal. ,2018;Coetzee et al. , ; Thanki and Thakkar, 2018; Singh et al. , 2019)”
From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Shamah, 2013
Some employees fear losing their jobs due to retrenchment when non-value-added activities become visible.
“authorssuchasKhabaand Bhar(2018),Shamah(2013)andWongandWong(2011)averredthatsomeemployeesfear losing their jobs due to retrenchment when non-value-added activities become visible.”
From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Shamah, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Shamah, R. A. M.
- Affiliations
- Arab Open University (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Shamah, Rania A.M.
- ORCID
- Shamah, Rania A.M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-03-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-35
- ISSN
- 2040-4166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048321298
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Lean Six Sigma (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- lean thinking, waste elimination, supply chain readiness, lean implementation barriers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review