Cited by 40Quality and Supply ManagementSustainable Supply Chain ManagementManagement and Optimization Techniques

Measuring and building lean thinking for value creation in supply chains

Shamah, Rania A.M.·2013·International Journal of Lean Six Sigma

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to develop a standardised instrument to measure the impact of lean thinking on supply chain value. This tool can be used to examine supply chain readiness and thus enhance overall value. It can also observe the potential role of customers, competitors and suppliers in increasing supply chain performance. Design/methodology/approach: A survey of previous studies is undertaken in the Egyptian industrial sector. The study also uses a questionnaire provided across all managerial levels of Egyptian firms. This questionnaire is divided into two main sections: the first section is considered to be about lean thinking stages for waste elimination, namely muri, mura and muda, while the second section relates to the value creation dimensions. Findings: The developed instrument accesses and analyses different types of lean thinking for identifying lean degree in supply chains. Consequently, it could lead to enhancing value creation in supply chains. This explorative study also indicates that the Egyptian industrial sector is willing to go lean. Research limitations/implications: Some limitations exist in this study. First, the survey was conducted on the Egyptian industrial sector. The applicability of the proposed scale should thus be further tested in different countries and service mixtures. Practical implications: Internal resistance is more of a barrier than external (customers, suppliers or competitors) resistance to lean thinking. Thus, organisations should focus first on internal (functional) integration and then move on to interorganisational integration. Further, people are more critical than technology in implementing lean thinking. Originality/value: There is little empirical research on the implementation of lean thinking. Practitioners and researchers should find value in this unique instrument.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/20401461311310490

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 40

Authors
Shamah, R. A. M.
Affiliations
Arab Open University (EG)
Corresponding author
Shamah, Rania A.M.
Venue
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2013-03-22
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
17-35
ISSN
2040-4166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048321298
Cited by
40
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
lean thinking, waste elimination, supply chain readiness, lean implementation barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review