CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Child Development and Digital TechnologyEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentGender and Technology in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Young Children’s Technology Experiences in Multiple Contexts: Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Theory Reconsidered

Wang, X. Christine, Berson, Ilene R., Jaruszewicz, Candace, Hartle, Lynn, Rosen, Dina·2010·High-Tech Tots
DOI 10.1108/978-1-61735-011-520251004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/978-1-61735-011-520251004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Barab, 2006, Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective, Educational Researcher, 35, 3, 10.3102/0013189X035005003 · DOI
  2. Bergen, 2008, Contemporary perspectives on science and technology in early childhood education, 87
  3. Berson, 2004, Developing thoughtful “cybercitizens.”, Social Studies and the Young Learner, 16, 5
  4. Berson, 2009, Panwapa: Global kids, global connections, Social Studies and the Young Learner, 21, 28
  5. Bodrova, 2005, High quality preschool programs: What would Vygotsky say?, Early Education and Development, 16, 437, 10.1207/s15566935eed1604_4 · DOI
  6. Bowman, 2001, Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers
  7. Bredekamp, 2008, Developmentally appropriate practice for programs serving children birth-eight
  8. Bronfenbrenner, 2004, Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development
  9. Bronfenbrenner, 2000, Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research design and empirical findings, Social Development, 9, 115, 10.1111/1467-9507.00114 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Buckleitner, 2008, Like taking candy from a baby: How young children interact with online environments
  11. Calvert, 2005, Age, ethnicity and socioeconomic patterns in early computer use: A national survey, American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 590, 10.1177/0002764204271508 · DOI
  12. Carr, 2000, Technological affordance, social practice and learning narratives in an early childhood setting, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 61, 10.1023/A:1008986002620 · DOI
  13. Ching, 2006, Technology: Issues in administration, policy, and applications in K-12 classrooms, 253
  14. Clements, 1999, Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education, 92
  15. Clements, 2003, Strip mining for gold: Research and policy in educational technology: A response to “Fool’s Gold.”, AACE Journal, 11, 769
  16. Cordes, 2000, Fool’s gold: A critical look at computers in childhood
  17. Crowley, 2002, Learning conversations in museums, 401
  18. Gewertz, 2007, “Soft Skills” in big demand: Interest in teaching students habits of mind for success in life is on the rise, Education Week, 26
  19. Gutierrez, 2003, Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice, Educational Researcher, 32, 19, 10.3102/0013189X032005019 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Haugland, 2000, Early childhood classrooms in the 21st century: Using computers to maximize learning, Young Children, 55, 12
  21. Isenberg, J. P., & Quisenberry, N. (2002). Play: essential for all children. A position paper of the Association for Childhood Education International. Retrieved from http://www.acei.org/playpaper.htm · DOI
  22. Kafai, 2006, Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies, Games and Culture, 1, 36, 10.1177/1555412005281767 · DOI
  23. Lemke, 2000, The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 193
  24. Mercer, 2008, The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 33, 10.1080/10508400701793182 · DOI
  25. Nir-Gal, 2004, Computers for cognitive development in early childhood: The teachers’ role in the computer learning environment, Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 97
  26. Rosen, Play within traditional and virtual microsystems: A study of young children’s WebKinz play
  27. Rosen, 2009, Developmentally appropriate technology use and early childhood teacher education, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 30, 162, 10.1080/10901020902886511 · DOI
  28. Sameroff, 2009, The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other, 10.1037/11877-000 · DOI
  29. Sarama, 2002, Contemporary Perspectives in Early Childhood Education, 171
  30. Shuler, 2007, D is for digital: An analysis of the children’s interactive media environment with a focus on mass marketed products that promote learning
  31. Siraj-Blatchford, 2002, Developmentally appropriate technology in early childhood: “Video conferencing.”, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3, 216, 10.2304/ciec.2002.3.2.5 · DOI
  32. Tapscott, 1997, Growing up digital: The raise of net generation
  33. Thouvenelle, 2003, Completing the computer puzzle: A guide for early childhood educators
  34. Van Scoter, 2002, Learners, language, and technology: Making connections that support literacy
  35. Vygotsky, 1978, Mind in society
  36. Wang, 2003, Social construction of computer experience in a first-grade classroom: Social processes and mediating artifacts, Early Education and Development, 14, 335, 10.1207/s15566935eed1403_4 · DOI
  37. Wang, 2006, Technology in early childhood education: An introduction, Early Education and Development, 17, 317, 10.1207/s15566935eed1703_1 · DOI
  38. Wells, 1986, The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn
  39. Wilensky, 1999, Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems perspective to making sense of the world, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3, 10.1023/A:1009421303064 · DOI
  40. Yan, 2004, How children and adults learn to use computers: A developmental approach, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 105, 41, 10.1002/cd.110 · DOI
  41. Yelland, 2005, The future is now: A review of the literature on the use of computers in early childhood education (1994-2004), AACE Journal, 13, 201232

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X. C., Berson, I. R., Jaruszewicz, C., Hartle, L., & Rosen, D.
ORCID
Venue
High-Tech Tots
Publisher
Emerald Publishing Limited
Published
2010-03-31
Pages
23-47
DOI
10.1108/978-1-61735-011-520251004
OpenAlex
W4417352172
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
young children, technology use, early childhood technology, multiple contexts, digital learning environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review