Cited by 0Evaluation of Teaching PracticesTeacher Education and AssessmentsStudent Assessment and Feedback

The Danielson Framework for Teaching as an Evaluation Rubric: One Size Fits None

Burns, Leslie David·2015·Rubric Nation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/978-1-62396-963-920251013

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Ash, 2008, Post-Fordism: A reader.
  2. Bardach, 2005, A practical guide to policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving
  3. Burns, 2014, Moving targets: A critical discourse analysis of standards and teacher preparation in English language arts
  4. Cherryholmes, 1988, Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education
  5. Danielson, 2013, The framework for teaching evaluation instrument
  6. Ippolito, 2013, Adolescent literacy in the era of the Common Core: From research to practice
  7. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers., 2010, English language arts standards.
  8. New London Group., 2000, Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures
  9. Null, 2011, Curriculum: From theory to practice
  10. Sawchuk, 2011, EWA research brief: What studies say about teacher effectiveness.
  11. Spiro, 1988, Tenth annual conference of the cognitive science society, 375
  12. Steele, 2011, Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do.
  13. Stone, 2002, Policy paradox: The art of political decision making
  14. Tyack, 1995, Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Burns, L. D.
Corresponding author
Burns, Leslie David
Venue
Rubric Nation
Published
2015-04-16
Pages
185-200
OpenAlex
W4417039232
Cited by
0
References
6
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
assessment rubrics, teacher evaluation, classroom assessment, instructional practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review