The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accounting, accountability, social media and big data: revolution or hype?
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to outline an agenda for researching the relationship between technology-enabled networks – such as social media and big data – and the accounting function. In doing so, it links the contents of an unfolding area research with the papers published in this special issue of Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. Design/methodology/approach: The paper surveys the existing literature, which is still in its infancy, and proposes ways in which to frame early and future research. The intention is not to offer a comprehensive review, but to stimulate and conversation. Findings: The authors review several existing studies exploring technology-enabled networks and highlight some of the key aspects featuring social media and big data, before offering a classification of existing research efforts, as well as opportunities for future research. Three areas of investigation are identified: new performance indicators based on social media and big data; governance of social media and big data information resources; and, finally, social media and big data’s alteration of information and decision-making processes. Originality/value: The authors are currently experiencing a technological revolution that will fundamentally change the way in which organisations, as well as individuals, operate. It is claimed that many knowledge-based jobs are being automated, as well as others transformed with, for example, data scientists ready to replace even the most qualified accountants. But, of course, similar claims have been made before and therefore, as academics, the authors are called upon to explore the impact of these technology-enabled networks further. This paper contributes by starting a debate and speculating on the possible research agendas ahead.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877
The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism
Kitchin, R. (2014) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 · Cited by 2,794
Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts
Kitchin, R. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714528481 · Cited by 2,355
How ‘big data’ can make big impact: findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study
Fosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031 · Cited by 1,905
Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/1935826.1935845 · Cited by 1,689
Accounting and the construction of the governable person
Miller, P., & O'Leary, T. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90039-0 · Cited by 1,505
The archeology of accounting systems
Hopwood, A. G. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9 · Cited by 1,265
Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose
Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14401 · Cited by 863
Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda
University of Virginia, Abbasi, A., Sarker, S., University of Virginia, Aalto University, Chiang, R., & University of Cincinnati (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00423 · Cited by 688
New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy
Constantiou, I. D., & Kallinikos, J. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.17 · Cited by 526
Cited by
The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance
Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751 · Cited by 533
Big Data and changes in audit technology: Contemplating a research agenda
Salijeni, G., Samsonova-Taddei, A., & Turley, S. (2019) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2018.1459458 · Cited by 247
van der Voort, H. G., Klievink, A. J., Arnaboldi, M., & Meijer, A. J. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.011 · Cited by 142
Self-citationThe loopholes of algorithmic public services: an “intelligent” accountability research agenda
Bracci, E. (2023) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-06-2022-5856 · Cited by 89
Pflueger, D., Kornberger, M., & Mouritsen, J. (2022) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2022.2147973 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnaboldi, M., Busco, C., & Cuganesan, S.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-05-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 762-776
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2605021906
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accounting, accountability, social media and big data: revolution or hype? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/aaaj-03-2017-2880
- The paper
- Arnaboldi, M., Busco, C., & Cuganesan, S. (2017). Accounting, accountability, social media and big data: revolution or hype? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2017-2880
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.