The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Valuing soccer players: on the valuation dynamics of an online user community
Open accessAbstract
Purpose This paper studies the interactive valuation discourses of an online user community (transfermarkt.de) that seeks to determine market values for soccer players. Despite their seemingly casual nature, these values have featured in newspapers, transfer negotiations, academic research, and capital market communication – and have thus become reified. Design/methodology/approach The paper employs netnographic research methodology to collect and thematically analyze a wide range of user entries on the platform. These entries are studied using theoretical insights from the sociology of quantification and valuation. Findings The analysis reveals how values are constructed in constant interaction between value-proposing users and value-justifying “experts.” This dynamic form of relational valuation positions players relative to one another as well as to actual transactions on the transfer market. In the absence of authoritative guidelines, it is this possibility and affordance for interaction that enacts a coherent valuation regime. The paper further reveals the platform's response to a disruptive event, which risked bringing the user-expert dynamics to a halt, requiring intervention from the platform to repair its valuation frame. Originality/value The paper responds to increased scholarly interests in the valuation of professional athletes. It contributes to the extant literature on valuation, first, by analyzing the dynamic valuation work that feeds into the social construction of values and, second, by studying platform participation and user interaction in a socially engineered online space.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A substantial body of accounting research has demonstrated how accounting practices construct spaces of calculation in which entities, people, and economic activities become visible, measurable, and governable (e.g., Cuckston, 2022; Detzen and Löhlein, 2023; Jeacle, 2015; Miller, 2001; Quattrone and Hopper, 2005).”
From State, great families, and Buddhism: monasticism as calculation in the fiscal governance of early medieval China (2026) · cites this paper as Detzen and Löhlein, 2023
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation
Lamont, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022 · Cited by 1,492
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349 · cited 2×
“…has begun to examine the “plethora of interacting devices, including rankings, ratings, reviews, and audits to establish orders of worth” in online environments (Kornberger et al., 2017, p. 79; Jeacle and Carter, 2011; Jeacle, 2017; Begkos and Antonopoulou, 2019; Van den Bussche and Dambrin, 2021).”
BackgroundTracking the numbers: Across accounting and finance, organizations and markets
Vollmer, H., Mennicken, A., & Preda, A. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.06.007 · Cited by 174
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 2019, Accounting and the business of sport: past, present and future, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32, 1861, 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4126 · DOI
- Axel Springer (2008), “Axel Springer übernimmt Mehrheit an Deutschlands größter Fußball-community”, Press release, 23 September 2008, available at: https://www.axelspringer.com/de/ax-press-release/axel-springer-uebernimmt-mehrheit-an-deutschlands-groesster-fussball-community
- 2015, Of principle and principal: value plurality in the market of impact investing, Valuation Studies, 3, 9, 10.3384/VS.2001-5592.15319 · DOI
- 2019, Measuring the unknown: evaluative practices and performance indicators for digital platforms, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33, 588
- 2013, The power of market intermediaries: from information to valuation processes, Valuation Studies, 1, 83, 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131183 · DOI
- 2013, The returns to scarce talent: footedness and player remuneration in European soccer, Journal of Sports Economics, 14, 606, 10.1177/1527002511435118 · DOI
- 2005, Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices, Organization Studies, 26, 1229, 10.1177/0170840605056393 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Vulgate accountability: insights from the field of football, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25, 602, 10.1108/09513571211225060 · DOI
- 2016, Transparency in an opaque market: evaluative frictions between ‘thick’ valuation and ‘thin’ price data in the art market, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 13, 10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.001 · DOI
- 2001, How real are statistics? Four possible attitudes, Social Research, 68, 339
- 2007, Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds, American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1, 10.1086/517897 · DOI
- 1998, Commensuration as a social process, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313, 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313 · DOI
- 2008, A sociology of quantification, European Journal of Sociology, 49, 401, 10.1017/S0003975609000150 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Language, translation and accounting: towards a critical research agenda, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31, 1844, 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2017-3055 · DOI
- 2012, Talent and/or popularity: what does it take to be a superstar?, Economic Inquiry, 50, 202, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00360.x · DOI
- 2020, Dis/assembling value: lessons from waste valuation practices, Valuation Studies, 7, 151, 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2020.7.2.151-166 · DOI
- 2022, Making intensity of efforts the same: commensuration work in target-setting practices, European Accounting Review, 31, 603, 10.1080/09638180.2020.1832901 · DOI
- 2013, For what it's worth: an introduction to valuation studies, Valuation Studies, 1, 1, 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.13111 · DOI
- 2014, When the crowd evaluates soccer players' market values: accuracy and evaluation attributes of an online community, Sports Management Review, 17, 484, 10.1016/j.smr.2013.12.006 · DOI
- 2013, What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice, Valuation Studies, 1, 125, 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312125 · DOI
- 2017, Constructing audit society in the virtual world: the case of the online reviewer, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30, 18, 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1540 · DOI
- 2021, Navigating netnography: a guide for the accounting researcher, Financial Accountability and Management, 37, 88, 10.1111/faam.12237 · DOI
- 2022, The gendered nature of valuation: valuing life in the Titanic compensation claims process, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 99
- 2011, In TripAdvisor we trust: rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 293, 10.1016/j.aos.2011.04.002 · DOI
- 2020, Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research
- 2018, Midweek effect on soccer performance: evidence from the German Bundesliga, Economic Inquiry, 56, 193, 10.1111/ecin.12465 · DOI
- 2020, Governing death: organizing end-of-life situations, Organization Studies, 41, 523, 10.1177/0170840618800107 · DOI
- 2020, At Barcelona there is no trust left – so how do they move forward?, The Guardian
- 2014, A ‘democratization’ of markets? Online consumer reviews in the restaurant industry, Valuation Studies, 2, 5, 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.14215 · DOI
- 2019, What's new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification, Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 223, 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343 · DOI
- 2021, Von Performativität zu Generativität: Bewertung und ihre Folgen im Kontext der Digitalisierung, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 73, 451
- 2015, Valuation and calculation at the margins, Valuation Studies, 3, 1, 10.3384/VS.2001-5592.15311 · DOI
- 2021, Editorial: themed section on accounting and valuation studies, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 91
- 2014, State privatization and the unrelenting expansion of neoliberalism: the case of the Greek financial crisis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 423, 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.08.007 · DOI
- 2017, Beyond crowd judgments: data-driven estimation of market value in association football, European Journal of Operational Research, 263, 611, 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.005 · DOI
- 2011, A flank movement in the understanding of valuation, The Sociological Review, 59, 24, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02056.x · DOI
- 2022, The assetization of baseball players: Instrumentalizing promise with signing bonuses and human capital contracts, Accounting, Organizations and Society
- 2014, What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector, Organization Science, 25, 868, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0877 · DOI
- 2020, Making artworks valuable: categorisation and modes of valuation work, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 91
- 1995, Trust in Numbers
- 2009, The discipline of rankings: tight coupling and organizational change, American Sociological Review, 74, 63, 10.1177/000312240907400104 · DOI
- 2009, Manipulierter Marktwert, Die Zeit
- 2008, A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations, Academy of Management Review, 33, 985, 10.5465/amr.2008.34422019 · DOI
- 2021, Peer-to-peer evaluations as narcissistic devices: fabricating an entrepreneurial community, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34, 505, 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2018-3797 · DOI
- 2013, Valuation as evaluating and valorising, Valuation Studies, 1, 31, 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131131 · DOI
- 2020, Thiago to Liverpool FC: what could a potential transfer look like?, Forbes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, Y., & Deng, C. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management · doi:10.1108/qram-08-2025-0201
Metadata
- Authors
- Detzen, D., & Löhlein, L.
- Affiliations
- WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management (DE)
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2023-02-28
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 608-626
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4322213571
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology, History and Politics of Sport
- Keywords
- online communities, sociology of quantification, professional athletes, platform governance, social construction of value, netnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valuing soccer players: on the valuation dynamics of an online user community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/aaaj-05-2022-5824
- The paper
- Detzen, D., & Löhlein, L. (2024). Valuing soccer players: on the valuation dynamics of an online user community. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-05-2022-5824