The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE : The purpose of this paper is to synthesise insights from accounting and accountability research into the rapidly emerging field of integrated reporting and proposes a comprehensive agenda for future research in this area. In so doing, it draws upon insights from other papers in this special issue of Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal on the theme of integrated reporting. \nDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH : The paper draws upon and synthesises academic analysis and insights provided in the embryonic integrated reporting academic literature in conjunction with policy pronouncements. \nFindings : The paper shows that the rapid development of integrated reporting policy, and early developments of practice, present theoretical and empirical challenges because of the different ways in which integrated reporting is understood and enacted within institutions. It highlights many areas where further robust academic research is needed to guide developments in policy and practice. \nRESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS : The paper provide academics, regulators and reporting organisations with insights into issues and aspects of integrated reporting that need further development and need robust evidence to help inform improvements in policy and practice. A key limitation is that it draws upon a synthesis of the existing literature which is at quite an early stage of development – but provides scope for considerable further development. \nORIGINALITY/VALUE : The paper provides the growing number of academic researchers in this emerging area with a foundation and agenda upon which they can build their research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: Capital market and real effects
Barth, M. E., Cahan, S. F., Chen, L., & Venter, E. R. (2017) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.005 · Cited by 602
Corporate social responsibility research in accounting
Huang, X. ‘., & Watson, L. (2015) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001 · Cited by 483
Evaluating the integrated reporting journey: insights, gaps and agendas for future research
Rinaldi, L., Unerman, J., & de Villiers, C. (2018) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-04-2018-3446 · Cited by 282
Self-citationTrue transparency or mere decoupling? The study of selective disclosure in sustainability reporting
Roszkowska-Menkes, M., Aluchna, M., & Kamiński, B. (2024) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102700 · Cited by 125
Communicating CSR: Integrated approach or Selfie? Evidence from the Milan Stock Exchange
Montecchia, A., Giordano, F., & Grieco, C. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.099 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2014-08-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1042-1067
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976898239
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 123.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/aaaj-06-2014-1736
- The paper
- de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-06-2014-1736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.